Skip to main content
Glama

SocialDataX 抖音 Douyin MCP

douyin_search_videos

Read-only

搜索抖音视频和图文作品。用户需要按搜索词查找作品时使用;已有作品链接或 aweme_id 且需要单篇信息时使用相应详情、评论或口播转文字工具;作品通常为视频,也可能包含图文内容;支持 page_token 翻页。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keywordYes搜索词,可传关键词或短语,例如品牌名、话题、人物名或产品名;不要传作品链接、用户主页链接、aweme_id、sec_user_id 或 page_token。
sort_typeNo搜索排序方式,可选:general(综合,默认)、time_descending(最新发布优先)、like_count_descending(最多点赞优先)。综合或默认排序请传 general,最新发布请传 time_descending,最多点赞请传 like_count_descending。hot、latest、time、relevance、relevance_desc、default、综合、general_desc、liked、like_count、liked_desc、most_liked、most_hot、popularity_descending 等写法均不是可接受值,请直接使用上述三个标准值。general
page_tokenNopage_token 是不透明分页令牌。首次请求留空;继续翻页时必须将上一次返回的完整 next_page_token 原样传入,作为 page_token 使用;只能用于同一搜索链路,不能跨能力、关键词或筛选条件复用;不得修改、截断、缩写、脱敏、掩码、省略、规范化、重组或自行生成,不得用省略号替换中间内容。
content_typeNo内容形式筛选,可选:all(不限,默认)、video(视频)、image(图文)。如无明确筛选需求,保持 all。all
duration_rangeNo视频时长筛选,可选:all(不限,默认)、under_1_minute(1 分钟以下)、one_to_five_minutes(1-5 分钟)、over_5_minutes(5 分钟以上)。如无明确筛选需求,保持 all。all
publish_time_rangeNo发布时间范围筛选,可选:all(不限,默认)、day(一天内)、week(一周内)、half_year(半年内)。如无明确筛选需求,保持 all。all

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes当前页搜索结果中的作品列表
pointsYes本次成功调用的积分消耗与调用完成时的账户积分余额。
next_page_tokenYes下一页不透明分页令牌;为空表示没有更多结果。继续翻页时必须将返回的完整 next_page_token 原样作为 page_token 传回。next_page_token 只能用于同一能力和同一分页链路,不能跨能力、作品、用户、评论、关键词或筛选条件复用;不得修改、截断、缩写、脱敏、掩码、省略、规范化、重组或自行生成,不得用省略号替换中间内容。

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the description's main added behavioral value is noting that results may include image-text works despite the 'videos' name, and that pagination via page_token is supported. This is useful but not extensive; the schema already documents the page_token mechanics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences that front-load the core purpose, then add usage routing, content-type nuance, and pagination support. Every sentence earns its place with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a search tool with an output schema, rich parameter schema, and safety annotations, the description covers purpose, when to use it, key content-type nuance, and pagination. Nothing needed for correct invocation or tool selection is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema itself provides very detailed parameter descriptions, including accepted enum values and invalid alternatives. The description adds minimal parameter-level meaning beyond repeating that page_token pagination exists, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (搜索) and resource (抖音视频和图文作品), and explicitly positions it as the tool for searching by keyword, distinguishing it from detail/comment/speech tools used when a link or aweme_id is already available. This makes its purpose clear and differentiates it from siblings without requiring schema inspection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when-to-use guidance ('用户需要按搜索词查找作品时使用') and names alternative tools for single-item lookups by link/aweme_id. However, it does not explicitly exclude the sibling search tools douyin_search_products and douyin_search_users, though '作品' and the resource phrasing imply they are separate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

每个工具都有明确目标且输入变体被清晰描述,如通过不同标识符获取用户信息,通过URL或ID获取评论。虽然存在相似工具,但描述提供了准确使用条件,不会造成混淆。

Naming Consistency5/5

所有工具遵循douyin_或socialdatax_前缀加动作(get/search/submit)加资源的模式,变体后缀(如_by_url、_by_sec_user_id)保持一致,整体命名规则清晰统一。

Tool Count4/5

19个工具对于覆盖用户、视频、评论、搜索和语音转文字等多样化功能流是合理的,虽然数量略多但每个工具在对应场景下都必要,没有过度膨胀。

Completeness4/5

覆盖了数据获取的主要域:用户信息、发布视频、短剧、评论、详情、搜索和独立语音转文字功能。缺少写操作或关注列表等,但作为数据读取MCP其覆盖已相当全面。

Resources