Skip to main content
Glama

get-export-schedule

Read-only

Get a single export schedule by its ID, including its published downloadUrl, columns, filters and next run date. Authenticated via bearer token.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "get-export-schedule"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesExport schedule ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new context: the call requires a bearer token and it enumerates what the response contains (published downloadUrl, columns, filters, next run date). It does not say what happens for an unknown ID.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short clauses with no filler, and the core purpose is front-loaded before the auth note. Every sentence carries information an agent would not get from the structured fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully lists the key returned fields and the auth requirement, which is enough to call and trust the result. Only error/not-found behavior is left unstated, a minor gap for a single-key read.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter and schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes 'id' as the export schedule ID. The description confirms the ID is the lookup key but adds no format, range or sourcing guidance beyond that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (get a single export schedule) with the lookup key (ID) and the payload contents. The word 'single' implicitly contrasts with the plural get-export-schedules sibling, but it never names that sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: fetching one already-known schedule by ID. There is no explicit statement of when to prefer this over get-export-schedules, nor any precondition such as 'call get-export-schedules first to obtain an ID'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.