Skip to main content
Glama

Create Feedback Form

create_feedback_form

Publish a voice-first feedback, cancellation, feature request, survey, or research form immediately after creator confirmation, with optional smart follow-ups.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
goalNo
titleNo
promptNoPlain-English ask or request. Use only when explicit questions are not already known.
contextNoPrivate context for smart follow-ups. Summarize relevant non-sensitive host-conversation context and append any extra context the creator provides. Never shown to respondents.
questionsNoExplicit questions to ask the respondent. Use this whenever questions already exist; preserve them exactly.
persistentNo
followUpModeNoFor exactly one question, set this only after asking the creator "Want smart follow-up questions?" Use deep_dive for yes or none for no. For multiple questions, use none unless explicitly requested.
responseModeNo
responseLimitNoUse "one" for a form intended for one named person/client. Use "multiple" for forms, surveys, feedback, customers, users, and public/embedded links.
questionContextNo
creationSessionUrlNo
max_total_questionsNoOptional compatibility setting. Omit for adaptive one-question smart follow-ups.
max_followups_per_questionNoOptional compatibility setting. Omit for adaptive one-question smart follow-ups.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Hidden context for the form."New value: +"Private context for smart follow-ups. Summarize relevant non-sensitive host-conversation context and append any extra context the creator provides. Never shown to respondents."
    • addedInput schema / properties / followUpMode / description
      Added value: +"For exactly one question, set this only after asking the creator \"Want smart follow-up questions?\" Use deep_dive for yes or none for no. For multiple questions, use none unless explicitly requested."
    • changedInput schema / properties / max_followups_per_question / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum AI follow-up questions per specified question. Use 1 for optional specified-question follow-ups."New value: +"Optional compatibility setting. Omit for adaptive one-question smart follow-ups."
    • changedInput schema / properties / max_total_questions / description
      Previous value: -"Total question safety cap. Use 20 for open-ended feedback conversations."New value: +"Optional compatibility setting. Omit for adaptive one-question smart follow-ups."
    • changedInput schema / properties / questions / items / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": false,
      -    "properties": {
      -      "context": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "id": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      },
      -      "text": {
      -        "type": "string"
      -      }
      -    },
      -    "required": [
      -      "text"
      -    ],
      -    "type": "object"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "maxLength": 200,
      +    "minLength": 1,
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "context": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "id": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "text": {
      +        "maxLength": 200,
      +        "minLength": 1,
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "text"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does mention 'immediately after creator confirmation' and 'optional smart follow-ups', which are useful behavioral traits. However, it doesn't disclose side effects (persistent forms, publishing implications), auth/permission needs, or whether publication is reversible. Partial coverage of a tool that clearly has side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that conveys the core purpose and key characteristics. It's appropriately concise without waste. Could arguably be front-loaded more clearly but overall it's tight.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a complex tool: 13 parameters, nested objects, conditional enums (followUpMode depends on creator response), and no output schema. The description covers none of the setup flow, prerequisites, or conditional logic that many schema descriptions hint at (e.g., followUpMode requires asking the creator first). For a tool this multi-faceted with no annotations and no output schema, the description is notably under-specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 54%, so the description needs to compensate significantly. The description mentions key concepts (voice-first, smart follow-ups, creator confirmation) but doesn't explain most of the 13 parameters (goal, title, persistent, responseMode, creationSessionUrl, questionContext have no schema descriptions). The high parameter count with only 54% coverage means much is left undocumented. However, several schema-level descriptions (followUpMode, responseLimit, questions) are quite detailed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it publishes voice-first feedback/cancellation/feature request/survey/research forms after creator confirmation. It's specific about verb (publish), resource (feedback forms), and timing (after creator confirmation). However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling create_form or create_ask — the relation to those tools is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage ('immediately after creator confirmation') but offers no explicit when-to-use vs alternatives. With siblings like create_form and create_ask existing, there's no guidance on when to pick this over them. The schema descriptions help somewhat but not in the description text itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources