Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools

SDR Capacity & Inbound Quota Planner

sdr_capacity_and_inbound_quota_planner

Read-onlyIdempotent

Work out how much inbound volume an SDR team can properly cover per month, and how many reps you would need to fully cover current inbound. See the full version at https://rahuldsarker.co/calculators/sdr-capacity-and-inbound-quota-planner

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`sdrs`	Yes	Number of SDRs on the team
`currency`	No	ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. "USD", "INR", "EUR", "GBP". Omit to show plain numbers.
`touchesPerLead`	Yes	Touches per lead in the cadence
`minutesPerTouch`	Yes	Minutes required per quality touch
`sellingHoursPerDay`	Yes	Selling hours per day, per rep, after meetings/admin/breaks
`workingDaysPerMonth`	Yes	Working days per month
`inboundLeadsPerMonth`	Yes	Inbound leads per month

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`url`	Yes
`kind`	Yes
`tool`	Yes	The calculator tool that produced this result
`notes`	Yes
`title`	Yes
`inputs`	Yes
`compact`	Yes
`metrics`	Yes	Every "Label: value" line of the result; value is the first number on the line
`currency`	Yes
`benchmarks`	Yes	Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers
`bookingUrl`	Yes
`calculator`	Yes	Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 30, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / currency

Added value: +{
+  "description": "ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. \"USD\", \"INR\", \"EUR\", \"GBP\". Omit to show plain numbers.",
+  "pattern": "^[A-Za-z]{3}$",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "benchmarks": {
+      "description": "Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "band": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "metric": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "name": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "read": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "segment": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "source": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "target": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "tone": {
+            "enum": [
+              "good",
+              "ok",
+              "warn",
+              "bad"
+            ],
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": "number"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "metric",
+          "name",
+          "value",
+          "display",
+          "band",
+          "tone",
+          "read",
+          "target",
+          "segment",
+          "source"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "bookingUrl": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "calculator": {
+      "description": "Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "compact": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "currency": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "inputs": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "propertyNames": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "kind": {
+      "const": "calculator",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "metrics": {
+      "description": "Every \"Label: value\" line of the result; value is the first number on the line",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "label": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "unit": {
+            "anyOf": [
+              {
+                "enum": [
+                  "currency",
+                  "x",
+                  "%",
+                  "months"
+                ],
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              {
+                "type": "null"
+              }
+            ]
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": [
+              "number",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "label",
+          "value",
+          "unit",
+          "display"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "notes": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "description": "The calculator tool that produced this result",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "kind",
+    "tool",
+    "title",
+    "calculator",
+    "url",
+    "bookingUrl",
+    "currency",
+    "compact",
+    "inputs",
+    "metrics",
+    "notes",
+    "benchmarks"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 29, 2026

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare a read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world computation, and the description is consistent with that. Beyond restating the two outputs, it discloses nothing extra — no assumptions about the cadence model, no rounding or edge-case behaviour — but with full annotation coverage the bar is lower and nothing is misleading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first sentence is efficient and front-loads the core value. The second sentence is purely promotional (a link to a 'full version') and does nothing to help selection or invocation, so it fails the 'every sentence earns its place' test.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a moderate-complexity calculator with a full schema, complete annotations, and an output schema, the description covers what the tool produces and needs no return-value explanation. It stops short of explaining the capacity model's assumptions, which would help an agent sanity-check inputs, hence not a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all seven inputs (sdrs, sellingHoursPerDay, minutesPerTouch, touchesPerLead, workingDaysPerMonth, inboundLeadsPerMonth, currency) are already documented. The description adds no format, unit, or default guidance beyond that, which is the expected baseline when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific computation (monthly inbound volume an SDR team can cover, plus reps needed to cover current inbound), which is more than a restatement of the name. It does not, however, distinguish itself from near-neighbours such as customer_success_capacity_planner or growth_team_hiring_sequence_planner, so an agent must infer the boundary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative-tool guidance at all. The only routing signal is the trailing marketing link to a 'full version', which does not tell an agent which sibling capacity/hiring calculator to pick.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?