Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools

Product-Led Growth Feasibility Grader

product_led_growth_feasibility_grader

Read-onlyIdempotent

Score whether a product can support a self-serve, product-led growth motion, versus a hybrid or sales-led approach, across 5 weighted criteria. See the full version at https://rahuldsarker.co/calculators/product-led-growth-feasibility-grader

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`ttv`	Yes	Time-to-value is minutes, not weeks: yes/partial/no. Weight 25
`price`	Yes	Price point supports self-serve / low ACV: yes/partial/no. Weight 15
`value`	Yes	Value is obvious before talking to sales: yes/partial/no. Weight 20
`viral`	Yes	Natural virality or collaboration built in: yes/partial/no. Weight 15
`currency`	No	ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. "USD", "INR", "EUR", "GBP". Omit to show plain numbers.
`selfserve`	Yes	A user can onboard with no human help: yes/partial/no. Weight 25

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description
`url`	Yes
`kind`	Yes
`tool`	Yes	The calculator tool that produced this result
`notes`	Yes
`title`	Yes
`inputs`	Yes
`compact`	Yes
`metrics`	Yes	Every "Label: value" line of the result; value is the first number on the line
`currency`	Yes
`benchmarks`	Yes	Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers
`bookingUrl`	Yes
`calculator`	Yes	Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 30, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / currency

Added value: +{
+  "description": "ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. \"USD\", \"INR\", \"EUR\", \"GBP\". Omit to show plain numbers.",
+  "pattern": "^[A-Za-z]{3}$",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "benchmarks": {
+      "description": "Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "band": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "metric": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "name": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "read": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "segment": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "source": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "target": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "tone": {
+            "enum": [
+              "good",
+              "ok",
+              "warn",
+              "bad"
+            ],
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": "number"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "metric",
+          "name",
+          "value",
+          "display",
+          "band",
+          "tone",
+          "read",
+          "target",
+          "segment",
+          "source"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "bookingUrl": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "calculator": {
+      "description": "Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "compact": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "currency": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "inputs": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "propertyNames": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "kind": {
+      "const": "calculator",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "metrics": {
+      "description": "Every \"Label: value\" line of the result; value is the first number on the line",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "label": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "unit": {
+            "anyOf": [
+              {
+                "enum": [
+                  "currency",
+                  "x",
+                  "%",
+                  "months"
+                ],
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              {
+                "type": "null"
+              }
+            ]
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": [
+              "number",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "label",
+          "value",
+          "unit",
+          "display"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "notes": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "description": "The calculator tool that produced this result",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "kind",
+    "tool",
+    "title",
+    "calculator",
+    "url",
+    "bookingUrl",
+    "currency",
+    "compact",
+    "inputs",
+    "metrics",
+    "notes",
+    "benchmarks"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 29, 2026

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the weighted-scoring model (5 weighted criteria) which is useful context, but says nothing about how ties, partial answers, or missing optional inputs are handled. It neither contradicts nor richly extends the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One tight sentence front-loads the purpose and criterion count. The trailing marketing URL (advertising 'the full version') is low-value for an agent deciding invocation, which keeps this from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, annotations cover safety, and the six-parameter schema is fully self-documenting. The description supplies the scoring concept, leaving only routing among similar grading siblings unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: all five enum inputs carry their own descriptions with per-criterion weights, and the optional currency parameter has a format example. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond '5 weighted criteria', so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: score whether a product can support a self-serve PLG motion versus hybrid or sales-led, across 5 weighted criteria. That is clear and actionable, but it never contrasts itself with close siblings such as product_market_fit_scoring_grader or freemium_to_paid_pipeline_modeler, so sibling differentiation is left to inference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'versus a hybrid or sales-led approach' implies the decision context for use, but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative among the many grading/calculator siblings. Usage is implied rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?