Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools

Pricing Page Architecture Grader

pricing_page_architecture_grader

Read-onlyIdempotent

Score a pricing page's choice architecture across six weighted criteria (tiers, highlighting, anchoring, comparison, CTA, billing toggle) into a 0-100 score. See the full version at https://rahuldsarker.co/calculators/pricing-page-architecture-grader

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`currency`	No	ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. "USD", "INR", "EUR", "GBP". Omit to show plain numbers.
`oneCtaPerTier`	Yes	One clear CTA per tier (weight 15)
`anchoringPresent`	Yes	Anchoring, a high tier frames the others (weight 15)
`threeToFourTiers`	Yes	3-4 tiers, not too few, not overwhelming (weight 15)
`clearFeatureComparison`	Yes	Clear feature comparison across tiers (weight 20)
`billingToggleWithSavings`	Yes	Monthly/annual toggle with savings shown (weight 15)
`recommendedPlanHighlighted`	Yes	A recommended / most-popular plan is highlighted (weight 20)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`url`	Yes
`kind`	Yes
`tool`	Yes	The calculator tool that produced this result
`notes`	Yes
`title`	Yes
`inputs`	Yes
`compact`	Yes
`metrics`	Yes	Every "Label: value" line of the result; value is the first number on the line
`currency`	Yes
`benchmarks`	Yes	Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers
`bookingUrl`	Yes
`calculator`	Yes	Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedSep 30, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / currency

Added value: +{
+  "description": "ISO 4217 code for money in the result, e.g. \"USD\", \"INR\", \"EUR\", \"GBP\". Omit to show plain numbers.",
+  "pattern": "^[A-Za-z]{3}$",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "benchmarks": {
+      "description": "Rule-of-thumb verdicts for the headline numbers",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "band": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "metric": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "name": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "read": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "segment": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "source": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "target": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "tone": {
+            "enum": [
+              "good",
+              "ok",
+              "warn",
+              "bad"
+            ],
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": "number"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "metric",
+          "name",
+          "value",
+          "display",
+          "band",
+          "tone",
+          "read",
+          "target",
+          "segment",
+          "source"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "bookingUrl": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "calculator": {
+      "description": "Slug of the interactive calculator on rahuldsarker.co",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "compact": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "currency": {
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "inputs": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "propertyNames": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "kind": {
+      "const": "calculator",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "metrics": {
+      "description": "Every \"Label: value\" line of the result; value is the first number on the line",
+      "items": {
+        "additionalProperties": false,
+        "properties": {
+          "display": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "label": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "unit": {
+            "anyOf": [
+              {
+                "enum": [
+                  "currency",
+                  "x",
+                  "%",
+                  "months"
+                ],
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              {
+                "type": "null"
+              }
+            ]
+          },
+          "value": {
+            "type": [
+              "number",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "label",
+          "value",
+          "unit",
+          "display"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "notes": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "title": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "tool": {
+      "description": "The calculator tool that produced this result",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "kind",
+    "tool",
+    "title",
+    "calculator",
+    "url",
+    "bookingUrl",
+    "currency",
+    "compact",
+    "inputs",
+    "metrics",
+    "notes",
+    "benchmarks"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedSep 29, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that this is a deterministic weighted scoring computation producing a bounded 0-100 result, which is useful behavioral context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first sentence is tightly front-loaded and complete. The second sentence is a promotional pointer to an external 'full version' that does not help an agent invoke the tool, so it does not fully earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, and the rich 100%-coverage input schema covers the criteria and weights. The description is complete enough for a self-contained scoring calculator, though it omits any routing guidance relative to siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter carrying its own description and weight, and six of seven have enums. The description's criterion list mirrors the schema without adding syntax or format detail, so the schema does the heavy lifting and the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (score) on a specific resource (pricing page's choice architecture), enumerates the six weighted criteria it evaluates, and declares the output form (0-100 score). An agent can distinguish it from siblings like pricing_elasticity_sandbox or other '*_grader' tools without inspecting the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The list of criteria implies the applicable context (a pricing page with tiers, CTAs, billing toggle), but there is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative among the many sibling graders. Usage is inferable rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Rahul D Sarker: Marketing & RevOps Tools tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?