Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds genuinely useful semantics by defining the default structure as 10,000,000 shares at $0.0001 par and explaining the custom structure path. However, it references use_default, authorized_shares, and par_value while the schema exposes useDefault, authorizedShares, and parValue; this naming mismatch is a correctness risk and prevents full compensation for the low schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.