Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is only 33%, so the description must compensate. It maps several kind enum values (SAFE, RSA, CAP_TABLE, WIRE_PROOF) and specifies mime_type=application/pdf, but omits EIN_DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, and FAST, does not explain the required companyId parameter, and its blanket application/pdf guidance is narrower than the schema's mimeType pattern.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.