Skip to main content
Glama

List Strategy Audiences

list_strategy_audiences
Read-onlyIdempotent

List audience archetypes for a strategy (PowerSource). Returns the Buyer Decoder archetype (source="buyer_profile", one entry max) plus up to 3 offering primary_audience segments (source="primary_audience"). Use this to pick which audience to target before generating copy / scripts / hooks — the UI picker reads the same projection.

Distinct from list_strategies (which lists scans for a brand): this lists audiences INSIDE one strategy.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
powersource_idYesStrategy (PowerSource / brief) id. Get from list_strategies. Returns the buyer-decoder archetype plus up to 3 primary_audience segments.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses return structure (one buyer profile entry, up to 3 primary audience segments) and sources. Annotations already declare read-only and idempotent, and description adds context about UI consistency. Minor missing detail about ordering, but sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise paragraphs, first for purpose and return data, second for usage and sibling differentiation. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given single parameter, full schema coverage, clear annotations, and no output schema, description fully covers what a user needs: what the tool does, what it returns, and how to get the required parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with description for powersource_id. Description reinforces 'Get from list_strategies' but adds no new semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it 'List audience archetypes for a strategy (PowerSource)' and specifies what is returned: Buyer Decoder archetype and up to 3 primary audience segments. It distinguishes from sibling list_strategies by noting it lists audiences inside one strategy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit when-to-use guidance: 'Use this to pick which audience to target before generating copy / scripts / hooks — the UI picker reads the same projection.' It also differentiates from list_strategies, which lists scans for a brand.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Despite the high tool count, most tools have distinct purposes with thorough descriptions that specify when to use each. Some overlap exists among creative direction tools (call_creative_worlds vs chat_with_creative_worlds), but the descriptions clarify usage patterns.

Naming Consistency3/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent overall: some follow verb_noun (create_powersource_url, decode_ad), others use noun_verb or compound names (adformula_intelligence, fleet_analytics_overview). However, subgroups like dispatch_* and list_*_presets maintain internal consistency.

Tool Count2/5

112 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the server covers a broad domain, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and suggests insufficient consolidation of related operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core creative intelligence workflows: brand analysis, ad decoding, script generation, creative direction, and research. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no social media publishing tools), but the main use cases are well-supported.