Skip to main content
Glama

List Strategies

list_strategies
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all PowerSource strategies (scans) for a brand. A brand has many strategies — one per scanned URL. Product-page strategies carry product_name and is_product_page=true; use these to label them in conversation or to pick the right one for a product-focused generation. Returns powersource_id (use as the brief/PowerSource id everywhere else), product_name, scanned_at, source_url, is_pinned. Free, read-only. Paginated via cursor.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size. Default 20, max 100.
cursorNoPagination cursor returned as next_cursor on the previous page.
brand_idYesBrand to list strategies for. Get from list_brands.
include_archivedNoInclude archived strategies. Default false.

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description confirms the tool is read-only and idempotent, consistent with annotations, and adds valuable details: pagination via cursor, returns specific fields, and is free. No contradictions; it enriches beyond the structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus a list of return fields. Every sentence adds value without redundancy. Information is front-loaded, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description lists all essential return fields, mentions pagination with cursor, and clarifies the free, read-only nature. It covers all needed information for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add parameter details. It provides none beyond what the schema already offers, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists all PowerSource strategies for a brand, distinguishing between product-page and non-product strategies. It explicitly mentions the verb 'list' and resource 'strategies', and subtly distinguishes from the sibling tool get_strategy by implying the list nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on when to use the tool: to label strategies in conversation or pick the right one for product-focused generation. While it doesn't explicitly state when not to use it, the context of listing all vs. fetching one is clear given sibling tools. It implies use for enumeration tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Despite the high tool count, most tools have distinct purposes with thorough descriptions that specify when to use each. Some overlap exists among creative direction tools (call_creative_worlds vs chat_with_creative_worlds), but the descriptions clarify usage patterns.

Naming Consistency3/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent overall: some follow verb_noun (create_powersource_url, decode_ad), others use noun_verb or compound names (adformula_intelligence, fleet_analytics_overview). However, subgroups like dispatch_* and list_*_presets maintain internal consistency.

Tool Count2/5

112 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the server covers a broad domain, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and suggests insufficient consolidation of related operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core creative intelligence workflows: brand analysis, ad decoding, script generation, creative direction, and research. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no social media publishing tools), but the main use cases are well-supported.