Skip to main content
Glama

Heista

by co.heista

List Static ads

list_image_ad_scan_presets
Read-onlyIdempotent

Static-ad references for image-led Heists. Workspace static scans + Heista-curated image ad heists. Read-only, free. Filter scope with only_workspace / only_official (mutually exclusive — same toggle as the in-app library lens). Page with limit + offset.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size. Default 24, max 100.
offsetNoOffset for paging through results. Default 0.
brand_idNoOptional brand_id to scope workspace presets to. Get from list_brands. Official presets are not brand-scoped and are unaffected by this filter.
only_officialNoWhen true, hide workspace (user-created) presets and only return Heista-curated (official) presets. Mutually exclusive with only_workspace.
only_workspaceNoWhen true, hide Heista-curated (official) presets and only return workspace (user-created) presets. Mutually exclusive with only_official.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as read-only and idempotent. The description adds specifics about the scope (workspace + Heista-curated) and the mutually exclusive filtering behavior, which goes beyond annotations and provides useful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and each sentence provides essential information without fluff. It is concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, but the description sufficiently explains the input scope and behavior. It could mention the default ordering or what fields are returned, but given the simplicity and typical list behavior, it is fairly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining the mutual exclusivity of only_workspace/only_official and the pagination pattern, but does not add significant extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool lists static-ad references for image-led Heists, covering both workspace and Heista-curated presets. It uses specific verbs ('list') and resources ('static-ad references'), and distinguishes from sibling tools by specifying the image-led Heist context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions filtering with only_workspace/only_official (mutually exclusive) and pagination with limit+offset, providing clear usage context. It does not explicitly exclude when not to use it, but the context is sufficient for differentiation from siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Heista toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Despite the high tool count, most tools have distinct purposes with thorough descriptions that specify when to use each. Some overlap exists among creative direction tools (call_creative_worlds vs chat_with_creative_worlds), but the descriptions clarify usage patterns.

Naming Consistency3/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent overall: some follow verb_noun (create_powersource_url, decode_ad), others use noun_verb or compound names (adformula_intelligence, fleet_analytics_overview). However, subgroups like dispatch_* and list_*_presets maintain internal consistency.

Tool Count2/5

112 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the server covers a broad domain, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and suggests insufficient consolidation of related operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core creative intelligence workflows: brand analysis, ad decoding, script generation, creative direction, and research. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no social media publishing tools), but the main use cases are well-supported.

Resources