Skip to main content
Glama

List Creative agent skills

list_creative_agent_skill_presets
Read-onlyIdempotent

Portable craft skills (frameworks + method + worked examples) a Creative Agent loads ON TOP of its worldview — additive and stackable, never substitutive (unlike a creative_director_playbook, which replaces the agent for a session). Pinned per character on creative_agent_versions.skill_ids. Workspace = org-authored private skills; official = the Heista-curated starter library. Read-only, free. Filter scope with only_workspace / only_official (mutually exclusive — same toggle as the in-app library lens). Page with limit + offset.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoPage size. Default 24, max 100.
offsetNoOffset for paging through results. Default 0.
brand_idNoOptional brand_id to scope workspace presets to. Get from list_brands. Official presets are not brand-scoped and are unaffected by this filter.
only_officialNoWhen true, hide workspace (user-created) presets and only return Heista-curated (official) presets. Mutually exclusive with only_workspace.
only_workspaceNoWhen true, hide Heista-curated (official) presets and only return workspace (user-created) presets. Mutually exclusive with only_official.

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds behavioral context beyond that: skills are loaded ON TOP of worldview, additive and stackable, not substitutive; they are free; filters are mutually exclusive and behave like the in-app library toggle. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence provides useful information: definition, contrast with sibling, storage location, filter options, mutually exclusive toggle, pagination. No filler or redundancy. Front-loaded with core concept.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not detail the return format. However, it covers purpose, usage, filtering, and contrasts with alternatives. For a list tool, the return is assumed to be a list of skill preset objects, but explicit missing fields would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description adds value by explaining the mutual exclusivity of only_workspace and only_official, the brand_id scope (workspace presets only, official unaffected), and the pagination pattern. This extra context elevates it above the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly defines skill presets as portable craft skills that are additive and stackable, contrasting them with creative_director_playbook which is substitutive. It specifies that skills are pinned per character on creative_agent_versions.skill_ids and distinguishes between workspace (org-authored) and official (Heista-curated) libraries. The verb 'list' is implicit but clear from the tool name and context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use this tool versus alternatives: unlike creative_director_playbook (which replaces the agent), skills are additive. It explains the filter scope options (only_workspace/only_official) as mutually exclusive and analogizes to an in-app library lens. Pagination via limit+offset is also noted.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Despite the high tool count, most tools have distinct purposes with thorough descriptions that specify when to use each. Some overlap exists among creative direction tools (call_creative_worlds vs chat_with_creative_worlds), but the descriptions clarify usage patterns.

Naming Consistency3/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent overall: some follow verb_noun (create_powersource_url, decode_ad), others use noun_verb or compound names (adformula_intelligence, fleet_analytics_overview). However, subgroups like dispatch_* and list_*_presets maintain internal consistency.

Tool Count2/5

112 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the server covers a broad domain, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and suggests insufficient consolidation of related operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core creative intelligence workflows: brand analysis, ad decoding, script generation, creative direction, and research. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no social media publishing tools), but the main use cases are well-supported.