Skip to main content
Glama

Fleet — Top Search Queries

fleet_gsc_top_queries
Read-onlyIdempotent

Top Google search queries by clicks or impressions from first-party Search Console data, optionally filtered to pages containing a path (e.g. "/decode"). The core tool for briefing programmatic SEO. Hard cap 50 rows, max window 28 days. Read-only.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoWindow in days (max 28). Default 28.
limitNoMax rows (default 25, hard cap 50).
order_byNoSort key. Default clicks.
page_prefixNoOnly include pages whose URL contains this path.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. Description adds hard caps, max window, and data source (first-party Search Console). No contradictions. Could mention sorting behavior, but overall sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each serving a purpose: functionality, use case, constraints. Front-loaded with core action. No extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers data source, filtering, ordering, limits, use case, and safety. Lacks explicit mention of output fields (e.g., clicks, impressions, position), but this is implied. Sufficient for a read-only listing tool with good annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). Description reinforces constraints (hard caps) and adds usage context for page_prefix filter. Adds value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it retrieves top Google search queries (verb+resource) from Search Console data. Distinguishes from siblings like fleet_gsc_top_pages by focusing on queries, and explicitly calls it 'the core tool for briefing programmatic SEO.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context for use ('the core tool for briefing programmatic SEO') and constraints (50 rows, 28 days). Does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives, but the family of fleet_gsc tools imply differentiation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Despite the high tool count, most tools have distinct purposes with thorough descriptions that specify when to use each. Some overlap exists among creative direction tools (call_creative_worlds vs chat_with_creative_worlds), but the descriptions clarify usage patterns.

Naming Consistency3/5

Naming conventions are inconsistent overall: some follow verb_noun (create_powersource_url, decode_ad), others use noun_verb or compound names (adformula_intelligence, fleet_analytics_overview). However, subgroups like dispatch_* and list_*_presets maintain internal consistency.

Tool Count2/5

112 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for well-scoped servers. While the server covers a broad domain, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and suggests insufficient consolidation of related operations.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core creative intelligence workflows: brand analysis, ad decoding, script generation, creative direction, and research. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no social media publishing tools), but the main use cases are well-supported.