inbox.get
Get one inbox item with its related job and application
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | Inbox item id |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes | ||
| meta | No |
Get one inbox item with its related job and application
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| item_id | Yes | Inbox item id |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes | ||
| meta | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Output schema / properties / data / properties / confidence / anyOfPrevious value: -[
- {
- "type": "number"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
-]New value: +[
+ {
+ "enum": [
+ "high",
+ "low"
+ ],
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+]Output schema / properties / data / properties / email / anyOfAdded value: +[
+ {
+ "additionalProperties": {},
+ "properties": {
+ "account": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "dkim_verified": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "from": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "id": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ }
+ ],
+ "description": "Stable resource identifier"
+ },
+ "replyable": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "sent_at": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "snippet": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "subject": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "thread_count": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "unsubscribable": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "id"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+]Output schema / properties / data / properties / payload / anyOfAdded value: +[
+ {
+ "additionalProperties": {},
+ "properties": {
+ "company": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "company_url": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "created_board_record": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "interviewers": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "job_url": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "location": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "logo_url": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "recruiter_name": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "role": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+]Output schema / properties / data / properties / related / items / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +{}Output schema / properties / data / properties / related / items / propertiesAdded value: +{
+ "from": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "id": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ }
+ ],
+ "description": "Stable resource identifier"
+ },
+ "kind": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "messages": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "sent_at": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "state": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "subject": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "unread": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+}Output schema / properties / data / properties / related / items / requiredAdded value: +[
+ "id"
+]Output schema / properties / data / properties / related / items / typeAdded value: +"object"Output schema / properties / data / properties / resulting / anyOfAdded value: +[
+ {
+ "additionalProperties": {},
+ "properties": {
+ "id": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ }
+ ],
+ "description": "Stable resource identifier"
+ },
+ "job_id": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ "type": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+]Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds that it returns related job and application, which is useful context beyond the annotations. However, it does not disclose potential error behavior or authentication requirements, so it adds limited incremental transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of nine words that is front-loaded with the action and resource. There is no redundancy or filler; every word contributes to the meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With an output schema present and only one clearly documented parameter, the description is sufficient for an agent to call the tool correctly. It specifies the retrieval scope (related job and application) and the annotations cover safety. The only minor gap is that it does not mention behavior when the item is not found, but this is not critical for basic usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage with the parameter description 'Inbox item id', and the description does not add any additional meaning or clarification about the parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already fully documents the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly specifies the action ('Get'), the resource ('one inbox item'), and the scope ('with its related job and application'). This explicitly differentiates it from inbox.list (which retrieves multiple) and inbox.get_thread (which retrieves threads), giving an agent a precise understanding of what this tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like inbox.list or inbox.get_thread. However, the singular 'one inbox item' implies it is for fetching a single item, which provides some implicit guidance. It does not name alternatives or exclusions, so the guidance is moderate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.