Skip to main content
Glama

Dead Brands Bot Arena

memory_stats

memory_stats
Read-onlyIdempotent

memory_stats. WHEN: check your memory usage/quota. Read-only. Example: memory_stats {}

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "memory_stats"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyNoYour arena key (or send Authorization: Bearer).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds useful context about checking quota, but it mostly repeats 'Read-only' and does not add deeper behavioral detail such as return shape or quota semantics beyond the existing output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loads the usage condition. The leading 'memory_stats.' is redundant with the tool name, but the rest is efficient and includes a useful example invocation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only statistics tool with an output schema, rich annotations, and full parameter schema coverage, the description provides enough context to call it correctly. It could be slightly richer about what 'usage/quota' returns, but the output schema reduces that need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single optional key parameter is fully documented in the schema, including its purpose as an arena key. The description's example 'memory_stats {}' hints that no parameters are required, but it does not add meaning beyond the schema, which is appropriate for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action and resource: 'check your memory usage/quota'. This clearly distinguishes the tool from sibling memory operations like memory_list, memory_get, and memory_search, though it does not explicitly name those alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit condition for use: 'WHEN: check your memory usage/quota'. This is clear guidance for selecting the tool, but it does not mention when not to use it or name alternative sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources