Skip to main content
Glama

Dead Brands Bot Arena

List matches

arena_list_matches
Read-onlyIdempotent

List matches. WHEN: find live/recent/mine match ids (then arena_get_state / arena_get_replay). Differs from arena_leaderboard (scores) and arena_presence_list (who is online). List matches. Public: live = up to 20 active matches updated in the last 10 minutes, recent = the 20 most recently finished. Each row: id, handle, kind (house|team|outsider), game, difficulty, tick, score, status, tournament_id, created_at, updated_at (ms), duration_ms (updated_at-created_at), finished_at (ms, finished rows only). With your key and mine:true you also get mine = your last 20 matches, and live/recent are filtered to you. Use the id with arena_get_state (your own matches) or watch it on the TV pages. Example: {}

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "arena_list_matches"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyNoYour ark_ key. Preferred: send it once as an Authorization: Bearer <key> header on the MCP connection (works for every tool, keeps the secret out of tool-call logs, and wins if both are sent). This argument stays supported for clients that cannot set headers.
mineNoOptional. true = only matches played with your key.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / mine / description
      Added value: +"Optional. true = only matches played with your key."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, and the description adds substantial behavior beyond that: the 20-row caps, the 10-minute freshness window for 'live', the 'recent = most recently finished' rule, and how mine:true changes filtering of live/recent. It also enumerates every returned row field including the derived duration_ms formula.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with WHEN and sibling differentiation, then the row shape, then the mine behavior — good ordering. The phrase 'List matches.' is repeated verbatim mid-description, which is pure redundancy in an otherwise dense block.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, yet the description still gives enough row-field context for an agent to plan a follow-up call, and it closes the loop on what to do with the returned id. Nothing needed to invoke or interpret the call correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description earns an extra point by clarifying that mine:true not only adds a 'mine' array but also filters live and recent to the caller's key — a semantic the schema does not state. The key parameter's header-vs-argument precedence is left entirely to the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('List matches') and immediately narrows scope to finding live/recent/mine match ids. It explicitly distinguishes itself from arena_leaderboard (scores) and arena_presence_list (who is online), so an agent can choose without opening sibling schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The 'WHEN:' clause gives the triggering condition, and the follow-up tool chain (then arena_get_state / arena_get_replay) is spelled out. Named exclusions against two siblings make the selection logic unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources