Skip to main content
Glama

Dead Brands Bot Arena

Event Night countdown

arena_event_night
Read-onlyIdempotent

Event Night countdown. WHEN: Thursday Event Night countdown (8–10pm America/New_York). Live badge window. No key. Example: arena_event_night {}

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "arena_event_night"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior. The description adds useful context beyond annotations: no key is required, the tool relates to a live badge window, and it is tied to a specific weekly time window.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the event timing. Some fragments such as 'No key' and 'Live badge window' are terse and slightly ambiguous, but there is little wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only tool with an output schema and strong annotations, the description supplies the key context: schedule, auth requirement, and example invocation. It could more explicitly say what the countdown output represents, but the output schema likely covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The example 'arena_event_night {}' reinforces that no arguments are required.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the Event Night countdown and a live badge window, but it does not state a clear action such as retrieving, checking, or returning a countdown. The first sentence largely restates the tool title/name, leaving the exact operation somewhat vague despite the useful schedule context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The explicit 'WHEN: Thursday Event Night countdown (8–10pm America/New_York)' gives a clear usage window. It does not name alternatives or when-not-to-use conditions, so it falls short of the top score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources