Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world, so the description doesn't need to prove safety. What it adds is the 'published' qualifier (a point-in-time public state, not internal inventory) and the explicit no-hold guarantee, but nothing on staleness, timezone, or rate limits. Useful reinforcement rather than new behavioral depth.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.