Skip to main content
Glama

DC Hub — Data Center & Power Intelligence

by cloud.dchub

List Saved Sites

list_saved_sites
Read-onlyIdempotent

NEEDS A KEY (free): saved sites are per-account, so a keyless call returns auth_required, not an empty list — if you have no key, call claim_free_key FIRST (one step, no email), then this. Use when a user asks to see or review their saved DC Hub shortlist in-chat, or wants to know what moved on it. Example: "What sites have I saved?" / "Did any of my saved sites move?" — list_saved_sites. Params: since (optional — "24h"/"7d"/ISO, default 7d — the delta window). Returns: each saved site with name, market, lat/lon, saved DCPI score, target MW, notes — PLUS live deltas: verdict_was/verdict_now (e.g. CAUTION → BUILD), excess-power move over the window, current vs at-save DCPI, alerts armed/fired, new facilities nearby, and a portfolio summary flagging which sites moved and which have no alert armed. Do NOT use to add a site (use save_site) or to download the list as a file (use export_dataset); this is the in-chat read-back.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sinceNoDelta window for per-site movement: "24h", "7d" (default) or an ISO-8601 timestamp — pass your cached generated_at from last session

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
_entityNoPayload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
citationNoMachine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
provenanceNoCollection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
_front_doorNoIn-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
_return_loopNoSuggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
site_evaluation_handoffNoPre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds crucial auth behavior: a keyless call returns auth_required rather than an empty list, and instructs the agent to call claim_free_key first. This goes beyond the annotations and schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense and well-organized, front-loading the auth requirement and usage. The detailed return-field list is somewhat redundant with the output schema, making it slightly long, but every section serves a clear purpose and there is no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with rich output schema and annotations, the description covers the key prerequisite, appropriate use cases, return-value highlights, and exclusions. Nothing material needed to invoke the tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'since' is fully described in the input schema (100% coverage). The description only restates the same format and default without adding new semantic meaning, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: listing the user's saved DC Hub shortlist, including movement/status. It explicitly distinguishes itself from save_site and export_dataset, so an agent can identify the correct tool even among many siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when-to-use conditions ('when a user asks to see or review their saved DC Hub shortlist...'), example user phrasings, when-not-to-use exclusions with named alternatives, and a prerequisite step (claim_free_key). No agent inference is required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DC Hub — Data Center & Power Intelligence toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes despite some thematic overlap, and each description includes explicit 'Do NOT use' guidance to prevent misselection. However, a few pairs like search_intelligence vs semantic_search are nearly identical in function, and the sheer number of tools increases the chance of selecting the wrong one without careful reading.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a predictable 'get_*' prefix for data reads, and many others use verb_noun patterns (analyze_*, rank_*, save_*, set_*). There are a handful of outliers like ai_capacity_index, grid_transition_radar, and site_selection_canvas that break the pattern, but overall the conventions are consistent enough for an agent to infer meaning.

Tool Count2/5

With 82 tools, this server is extremely heavy compared to typical MCP servers (3-15 tools). While the domain is broad, many tools serve narrow sub-purposes and could be consolidated (e.g., multiple site-scoring variants, multiple grid telemetry endpoints). The count overwhelms an agent's ability to choose efficiently and feels like over-fragmentation rather than necessary granularity.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of data-center siting intelligence: site analysis, grid, fiber, water, climate, tax, permitting, deals, news, saved-site management, and meta-planning. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete or update operations for saved sites), but the core workflows are well-supported and the descriptions are comprehensive.

Resources