DC Hub

Get Composite Site Score

get_composite_site_score

Read-onlyIdempotent

Use when a user wants ONE honest 0-100 site suitability/risk verdict for a lat/lon WITH an explicit per-factor coverage map — which factors are actually measured vs. declared unavailable. Unlike analyze_site (full raw data dump), this scores ONLY over VALIDATED factors and never imputes a missing one: power/grid, fiber, natural-hazard risk (FEMA NRI) and water (live WRI Aqueduct 4.0 baseline water stress) are all live; water is "unavailable" only outside basin coverage (never faked); market/DCPI is v1-unavailable (use rank_markets). Example: get_composite_site_score lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 state=AZ. Returns {composite_score (0-100 over validated factors), verdict (BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID), confidence (complete|conditional), coverage {power_grid|fiber|water|risk_resilience|market_dcpi: validated|unavailable}, coverage_ratio, sub_scores, caveats}. Use analyze_site for full data, compare_sites for 2-4 sites, rank_markets for whole-market ranking.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`lat`	No	Site latitude in decimal degrees (-90 to 90, required), e.g. 33.45
`lng`	No	Alias for lon — either name works
`lon`	No	Site longitude in decimal degrees (-180 to 180, required), e.g. -112.07
`state`	No	US state abbreviation (optional) — improves water/context lookups, e.g. AZ
`latitude`	No	Alias for lat — either name works
`longitude`	No	Alias for lon — either name works

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`quota`	No	Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier).
`_entity`	No	Payload class (facility\|market\|iso_grid\|queue_results\|deal\|report\|response); branch on it.
`citation`	No	How to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string.
`provenance`	No	Source, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing.
`_front_door`	No	First-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan.
`_return_loop`	No	Next-session delta call (get_changes).
`site_evaluation_handoff`	No	Follow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

AddedOct 9, 2026
RemovedSep 29, 2026

Changed2 schema fields changedAug 21, 2026

removedInput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

removedOutput schema / $schema

Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"

Changed5 schema fields changedAug 11, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -{}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  }
+]

changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description

Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."

removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
```
Removed value: -{}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
```
Removed value: -"object"
```

Changed1 schema field changedJul 21, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / _front_door

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "description": "In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.",
+  "properties": {},
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed5 schema fields changedJul 18, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -{}
```

addedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "items": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": {},
+    "properties": {},
+    "type": "object"
+  }
+]

changedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / description

Previous value: -"Pre-built follow-up call (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates."New value: +"Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."

removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / properties
```
Removed value: -{}
```
removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / type
```
Removed value: -"object"
```

Changed1 schema field changedJul 17, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "description": "DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys.",
+  "properties": {
+    "_entity": {
+      "description": "Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "_return_loop": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "citation": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "provenance": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "quota": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "site_evaluation_handoff": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "description": "Pre-built follow-up call (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates.",
+      "properties": {},
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed3 schema fields changedJul 16, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / latitude

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for lat — either name works",
+  "type": "number"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / lng

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for lon — either name works",
+  "type": "number"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / longitude

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Alias for lon — either name works",
+  "type": "number"
+}

AddedJul 9, 2026

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so safety is covered. The description adds real behavior beyond that: it never imputes a missing factor, water is marked unavailable only outside basin coverage and 'never faked', market/DCPI is v1-unavailable, and it names the live data sources (FEMA NRI, WRI Aqueduct 4.0). No auth, rate-limit, or latency notes, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the trigger condition, then differentiators, then an example, then the return shape and alternatives — a sensible priority order. It is dense and long, with the return-shape enumeration arguably padded given an output schema exists, but nearly every clause carries distinct routing or behavior information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only scoring tool with an output schema, the description covers trigger, data provenance, failure semantics, example call, and sibling routing — nothing an agent needs to select or invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description's concrete example ('lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 state=AZ') demonstrates the canonical invocation and confirms state is optional context, which is marginal added value over the schema. It does not clarify the alias precedence (lat/longitude, lon/lng) that the schema hints at.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource — a 0-100 site suitability/risk verdict for a lat/lon — plus a distinctive output feature (explicit per-factor coverage map). It explicitly contrasts itself with siblings: 'unlike analyze_site (full raw data dump)' and 'use rank_markets' for market/DCPI, so an agent can separate it from neighbors without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Opens with an explicit trigger ('Use when a user wants ONE honest 0-100 site suitability/risk verdict') and closes with a routing table for alternatives: analyze_site for full data, compare_sites for 2-4 sites, rank_markets for whole-market ranking. Both when-to-use and when-to-use-something-else are covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DC Hub tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.