Skip to main content
Glama

Bind Email

bind_email

★ WHAT THIS DOES AND DOES NOT DO — binding makes a key RECOVERABLE (lose it, call recover_my_key, it is re-sent to that inbox). It does NOT make your identity durable: an email-bound key still only works while your client keeps resending the header, and the measured cross-week return for bound keys is not distinguishable from unbound (0 of 3 mature identities, 2026-08-12 — a cohort far too small to claim either way, so this is UNPROVEN, not disproven). The one path measured to actually retain is an OAuth sign-in, which needs a human at a browser and is only offered if your client got a 401 WWW-Authenticate challenge; if it did not, binding here is the best durability available to you and is worth doing. Tie your DC Hub key to your human's email so the key is RECOVERABLE and upgrade receipts land in the right inbox. Call this once your human shares their email. HONEST LADDER: an unbound key gets previews plus 2 full answers per tool per day, renewed daily, then previews until the next day; binding restores the FREE tier at 50 calls/day and makes the key recoverable next session (binding is free — no card). If you hit that gate mid-task, PAUSE and ask your human: "DC Hub needs an email to keep our free data access — which address should I use?" Use the email your human EXPLICITLY gave you — NEVER invent, guess, or use a placeholder address (owner@example.com, user@test.com etc. are rejected server-side; a fake email makes the key unrecoverable and helps no one). If your human hasn't shared an email, ask them first — don't call this tool with a made-up value. Params: email (required), api_key (optional — omit to bind the key already active on this session). CONSENT/PURPOSE: the email is used ONLY to recover your key and route upgrade receipts (transactional). No marketing without explicit opt-in (default OFF), and no newsletter or digest. The relaying agent should surface this purpose line to its human before binding. If the email can't be accepted, the key keeps working — just try another address. To ALSO subscribe your human to the FREE weekly digest (the markets, deals and facilities that moved in what they queried), pass marketing_opt_in=true — but ONLY after they explicitly agree to marketing email; default false = transactional only, and they can unsubscribe anytime. Returns the unlocked benefits + confirmation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailYesYour human's real email address (required) — use only an address they explicitly gave; placeholder/fake addresses are rejected
api_keyNoOptional key to bind; omit to bind the key already active on this session
marketing_opt_inNoSet true ONLY after your human explicitly agrees to marketing email (default false = transactional only)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier).
_entityNoPayload class (facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response); branch on it.
citationNoHow to attribute DC Hub: {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}, or the attribution line as a string.
provenanceNoSource, method, as_of, verification_counts, license, cite_as; quote it when citing.
_front_doorNoFirst-tool hint: plan_query(intent) returns the ordered plan.
_return_loopNoNext-session delta call (get_changes).
site_evaluation_handoffNoFollow-up calls [{tool, parameters, why}] when the payload carries coordinates.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "email"
      +]
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  5. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / citation / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / citation / description
      Previous value: -"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload."New value: +"Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / properties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / citation / type
      Removed value: -"object"
  6. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / _front_door
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "In-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.",
      +  "properties": {},
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  7. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -{}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "items": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "type": "array"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": {},
      +    "properties": {},
      +    "type": "object"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / description
      Previous value: -"Pre-built follow-up call (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates."New value: +"Pre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / properties
      Removed value: -{}
    • removedOutput schema / properties / site_evaluation_handoff / type
      Removed value: -"object"
  8. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": {},
      +  "description": "DC Hub envelope: structuredContent mirrors the JSON payload in content[0].text — tool-specific data fields ride at the top level alongside these envelope keys.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "_entity": {
      +      "description": "Payload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "_return_loop": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Suggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "citation": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Machine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "provenance": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Collection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "quota": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Caller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "site_evaluation_handoff": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {},
      +      "description": "Pre-built follow-up call (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates.",
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  9. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / api_key / description
      Added value: +"Optional key to bind; omit to bind the key already active on this session"
    • addedInput schema / properties / email / description
      Added value: +"Your human's real email address (required) — use only an address they explicitly gave; placeholder/fake addresses are rejected"
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketing_opt_in / description
      Added value: +"Set true ONLY after your human explicitly agrees to marketing email (default false = transactional only)"
  10. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / marketing_opt_in
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  11. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations covering only the mutation profile (readOnlyHint=false, idempotent=false), the description carries the remaining burden well: what binding does and does not confer (recoverability yes, durable identity unproven), the free-tier rate change (50 calls/day), transactional-only email use with opt-in marketing, and graceful failure ('if the email can't be accepted, the key keeps working'). This is unusually rich behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A ~400-word wall of text with a unicode banner, dated cohort statistics ('0 of 3 mature identities, 2026-08-12'), and repeated warnings about fake emails. The genuinely actionable instructions are interleaved with research narrative, so it is neither front-loaded nor economical; several sentences do not earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained. The description covers consent/purpose, the failure fallback, tier implications, and the marketing default — everything an agent needs to invoke this correctly and handle edge cases. Nothing material is missing for a 3-parameter mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so all three parameters are already documented in the schema, including the placeholder-rejection rule and the api_key omission behavior. The description largely restates these constraints (fake emails rejected, api_key optional, marketing_opt_in default false) rather than adding syntax or format detail beyond them. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb+resource ('Tie your DC Hub key to your human's email') and scopes the benefit precisely: recoverability and free-tier restoration. It also distinguishes itself from the sibling 'recover_my_key' and explains the OAuth alternative path. However, the core purpose is buried under layers of cohort statistics and durability caveats, so an agent must dig to find it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit when-to-call ('Call this once your human shares their email'), explicit when-NOT-to-call ('If your human hasn't shared an email, ask them first — don't call this tool with a made-up value'), explicit mid-task pause script, and an explicit condition for the alternative path (OAuth requires a 401 challenge). Alternatives and preconditions are all named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.