Skip to main content
Glama

DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, Fiber

by cloud.dchub

Get Power Pipeline

get_power_pipeline
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use when a user asks WHERE NEW POWER GENERATION is coming online (the forward supply pipeline) — e.g. "how much new generation is planned in Virginia / the Southeast / ERCOT, and when?". Planned, permitting, and under-construction generators NATIONWIDE from EIA-860M, INCLUDING non-ISO regions (TVA, Southern Co, Arizona PS, PacifiCorp, LADWP) that interconnection-queue feeds miss. Each generator has location (lat/lng), state, county, balancing authority, technology/fuel (solar photovoltaic, onshore wind, natural-gas combined cycle, batteries, nuclear), nameplate megawatts (MW), status (planned → under construction), and planned online month/year. Filter by state (2-letter, e.g. VA), ba (balancing-authority/ISO code, e.g. PJM, ERCO, SOCO, TVA), status (P/L/T=planned, U/V=under construction, TS=testing), or min_mw. Returns a summary (total planned MW, mix by technology + status) plus the largest projects. Answers "how much new generation is planned in Virginia and when does it land". Try: get_power_pipeline state=VA. Do NOT use for ALREADY-OPERATING capacity or grid headroom (use get_grid_intelligence / get_grid_data) or for data-center construction projects (use get_pipeline).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
baNoBalancing-authority / ISO code, e.g. PJM, ERCO, SOCO, TVA, AZPS
limitNoMax results to return (1-500; default varies by tool)
stateNoUS state abbreviation to filter generators, e.g. VA, TX
min_mwNoMinimum nameplate capacity filter in megawatts (MW)
statusNoGenerator status code: P/L/T (planned), U/V (under construction), TS (testing)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
quotaNoCaller quota state (remaining calls, tier) when available.
_entityNoPayload class discriminator (e.g. facility|market|iso_grid|queue_results|deal|report|response) — branch on this before parsing the rest.
citationNoMachine-readable citation: how to attribute DC Hub (dchub.cloud) for this payload. Normally an OBJECT {source, url, license, cite_as, retrieved_at}; a bare string is accepted and carries the attribution line itself.
provenanceNoCollection-level provenance block: {source, method, as_of, verification_counts, cite_url_template, license, cite_as}. Quote the verification level when citing.
_front_doorNoIn-band front-door hint (first workflow-entry tool of a session): call plan_query(intent) first for the ordered multi-step plan.
_return_loopNoSuggested next-session delta call (get_changes since=24h) so you pull only what changed.
site_evaluation_handoffNoPre-built follow-up calls (analyze_site / get_water_risk args) when the payload carries coordinates — an array of {tool, parameters, why} entries.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, and the description adds meaningful behavioral detail: coverage of non-ISO regions, inclusion of planned/permitting/under-construction statuses, returned summary fields, and the mix of technology/status. It also discloses what the tool is not for, which helps avoid misuse.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-structured, opening with when to use it, followed by data scope, returned fields, filters, an example, and explicit exclusions. Every sentence carries useful information, though it could be tightened slightly without losing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Combined with a 100%-covered schema, an output schema, and annotations, the description provides everything an agent needs: usage trigger, scope, returned data shape, filter semantics, an example query, and alternative tool routing. There are no significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description adds value by decoding status codes (P/L/T, U/V, TS), giving concrete examples for state/ba filters, and confirming min_mw refers to nameplate capacity. This goes beyond the schema's definitions without being redundant.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb plus resource: retrieving the forward supply pipeline of planned/under-construction power generation. It clearly distinguishes itself from related tools like get_interconnection_queue, get_grid_intelligence, and get_pipeline by naming exactly what it covers and what it does not.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit conditions for use ('Use when a user asks WHERE NEW POWER GENERATION is coming online') and explicit exclusions with alternative tool names ('Do NOT use for ALREADY-OPERATING capacity... use get_grid_intelligence / get_grid_data'). This is ideal routing guidance for an agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All DC Hub — Data Center Site Selection & Colocation: Electricity, Power Grid, Gas, Fiber toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation1/5

With 85 tools, several families are heavily overlapping: semantic_search and search_intelligence are explicitly documented as the same retrieval with different call shapes, save_site and save_to_shortlist both persist sites, and list_saved_sites and get_shortlist both read saved sites. Additionally, site scoring is split across analyze_site, get_composite_site_score, score_facility, and rank_sites, making correct tool selection very difficult for an agent.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names are snake_case and mostly readable, but conventions are mixed: many use get_* (get_facility, get_grid_intelligence), others use verb phrases (analyze_site, compare_isos, rank_markets), and some are bare noun phrases (ai_capacity_index, hyperscaler_deals, grid_transition_radar, site_selection_canvas). The search family alone uses search, search_facilities, semantic_search, and search_intelligence with no consistent pattern.

Tool Count1/5

85 tools is an extreme count for any MCP server, far beyond the 3-15 well-scoped range and above the 50+ threshold described as an extreme mismatch. Even with a wide domain like data-center siting, this many tools overwhelms agent context and makes selection costly.

Completeness4/5

The domain surface is exceptionally broad: siting, grid, gas, fiber, water, climate, tax, permitting, deals, news, facilities, saved shortlists, alerts, webhooks, key management, and research dossiers are all covered with connected workflows. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete or update for saved sites and no pause/resume for standing intents, but these are workable rather than blocking.

Resources