Skip to main content
Glama

holidays

Public holidays for any country and year, plus optional business-day checking. Pass country= (ISO alpha-2) and year=; add date= to learn whether that day is a business day, whether it is a weekend or public holiday, the holiday name, and the next business day. Covers 100+ countries. JSON response. [Paid: $0.01 USDC per call via x402 on Base; the calling client pays automatically.]

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dateNoYYYY-MM-DD to run a business-day check, optional
yearNoYear, default current
countryYesISO 3166 alpha-2 country code, e.g. US, GB, DE

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It discloses cost ($0.01 per call), coverage (100+ countries), response format (JSON), and behavior with the date parameter (returns business day info). However, it does not mention error handling or explicit read-only nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences plus a brief pricing note. Front-loaded with purpose, then usage. No redundancy or unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description fully explains the return values (business day, weekend/public holiday, holiday name, next business day). Covers 100+ countries and JSON format. Complete for a simple lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 3 parameters. The description adds context beyond schema: explains ISO alpha-2, default year, and what the date parameter returns (business day check, next business day). This enhances usability.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns public holidays for any country and year, with optional business-day checking. It specifies what each parameter does and what the response includes, distinguishing it from sibling tools which are unrelated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear usage instructions: pass country and year, optionally add date for business-day check. It implicitly differentiates from siblings as the only holiday tool, but lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each of the 30 tools has a highly specific, non-overlapping purpose, from brand visibility to chemical safety to YouTube transcripts. Descriptions are detailed and clearly differentiate each tool's function, eliminating ambiguity.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use lowercase with hyphens, creating a consistent visual pattern. However, the structure varies: some are noun-verb (email-validate, pdf-extract), others noun-noun (brand-visibility, chem-compat). This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score.

Tool Count3/5

With 30 tools, the server offers a very broad surface. While each tool earns its place as a distinct utility, the high count may overwhelm agents and dilute focus. It is borderline heavy for a single server, hence a score of 3.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers a wide range of domains: business, chemicals, crypto, domain, email, finance, holidays, trade, jobs, legal, mapping, medical, news, packages, electronics, PDF, product, recall, sanctions, screenshots, SEC, tech stack, web archive, web search, YouTube. Yet it lacks some common utilities like weather, translation, or image analysis, leaving notable gaps for a general-purpose utility server.