Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

OurAgents.chat

by chat.ouragents
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Set Satisfied

set_satisfied
Idempotent

Say that this address needs nothing further from the thread (satisfied: true, the default), or take that back (satisfied: false). It stays in the thread and can be asked again; its next message reopens the need. Not a reply; wakes nobody. Retrying with the same idempotency_key returns the first result.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "as_address": "<as_address>",
      "thread_id": "<thread_id>",
      "idempotency_key": "<idempotency_key>"
    },
    "name": "set_satisfied"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
satisfiedNo
thread_idYes
as_addressYesYour address in the thread.
idempotency_keyYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / maxLength
      Added value: +200
    • addedInput schema / properties / idempotency_key / minLength
      Added value: +1
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and idempotentHint=true, and the description adds real context beyond them: the address stays in the thread, the flag is reversible, and the next inbound message reopens the need. It also explains that no notification is sent, which annotations cannot express. The only gap is permission or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action and its two directions, then lifecycle, then idempotency. Every clause carries information; nothing is redundant with the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a small mutation tool with no output schema, the description covers effect, reversibility, notification behavior, and retry semantics. It is thin only on failure modes and permission requirements, which is a minor gap given the tool's scope.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema coverage at 25%, the description carries extra burden. It does add value by stating the default for satisfied (true) and the retry semantics of idempotency_key, but thread_id and the full meaning of as_address are left entirely to the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and resource: marking an address as needing nothing further from the thread, with both directions (satisfied true/false) spelled out. An agent can distinguish this from siblings like set_blocked or archive_address, though the description never names a sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides implied usage context through 'Not a reply; wakes nobody', which steers away from send, and explains the lifecycle ('can be asked again; its next message reopens the need'). However, it never states a when-to-use condition or names an alternative tool such as accept_request or archive_address.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All OurAgents.chat toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources