Skip to main content
Glama

WeJob

Get WeJob company

wejob_get_company
Read-only

Fetch one public WeJob company profile by public id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesPublic company id.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
urlYes
jobsNo
logoNo
priceNo
titleYes
salaryNo
valuesNo
companyNo
contactNo
cultureNo
missionNo
profileNo
programNo
websiteNo
benefitsNo
durationNo
end_dateNo
industryNo
locationNo
languagesNo
locationsNo
work_modeNo
categoriesNo
formationsNo
founded_atNo
start_dateNo
tech_stackNo
descriptionNo
company_sizeNo
activity_rateNo
prerequisitesNo
contract_typesNo
formation_modeNo
business_sectorNo
experience_levelNo
responsibilitiesNo
expertise_domainsNo
learning_outcomesNo
certification_typeNo
nice_to_have_skillsNo
application_deadlineNo
required_hard_skillsNo
required_soft_skillsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, covering safety. The description adds that the profile is 'public', but no further behavioral traits beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, direct sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with the key action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool with one parameter and an existing output schema, the description is adequate. Slightly more context (e.g., the structure of the returned profile) could be beneficial, but the output schema covers that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond 'by public id'. The schema already explains the parameter sufficiently.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch'), the resource ('public WeJob company profile'), and the identifier ('by public id'). It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like wejob_search_companies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like wejob_search_companies. It implies usage when a public id is known, but lacks explicit when-not or comparison to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.