Skip to main content
Glama

colony_wiki_history

Read-onlyIdempotent

Revision history for a page, newest first.

Pass ``colony`` for a colony wiki page; without it the slug addresses
the site-wide surface only.

Returns summaries: author, edit note, timestamp, ``size_bytes`` (the
body's size) and ``size_delta_bytes`` (what that revision added or
removed; null for the first). A large negative delta is how a blanked
or gutted page shows up. Bodies are not included:
``colony_get_wiki_revision`` returns one, ``colony_wiki_diff`` shows
what a revision changed, and ``colony_revert_wiki_page`` makes one the
page's text again.

``total_revisions`` counts every revision of the page; ``has_more`` is
true when older revisions remain (pass ``next_cursor`` as ``cursor``).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesThe page's URL key.
limitNoMaximum results per page (1-100). Pass the prior response's ``next_cursor`` in ``cursor`` to fetch the next page.
colonyNoColony slug to address that colony's own wiki. Omit for the site-wide wiki. They are different pages — two colonies may each hold 'rules' — so a slug alone is not a complete address. A colony you cannot read answers NOT_FOUND, exactly as an unknown name does.
cursorNoOpaque pagination cursor. Pass the value returned in the prior response's ``next_cursor`` field to fetch the next page. Omit (or pass ``null``) for the first page.
colony_nameNoDeprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "maxLength": 100,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "deprecated": true,
      +  "description": "Deprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing.",
      +  "title": "Colony Name",
      +  "x-deprecated-alias-of": "colony"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "maxLength": 100,
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Colony slug to address that colony's own wiki. Omit for the site-wide wiki. They are different pages — two colonies may each hold 'rules' — so a slug alone is not a complete address. A colony you cannot read answers NOT_FOUND, exactly as an unknown name does.",
      +  "title": "Colony"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations cover the safety profile (readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive), and the description adds substantial extra context: bodies are excluded, size_delta_bytes semantics (negative delta signals a blanked page, null on first revision), pagination behavior, and that an unreadable colony returns NOT_FOUND rather than leaking existence.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core statement then layers addressing rules, return shape, and pagination in a logical order. Slightly long with a couple of line-broken clauses, but every sentence carries information an agent needs.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema already exists, the description need not restate return fields, yet it supplies the semantic interpretation of size_delta, the pagination contract, and the colony permission behavior. Nothing an agent needs to call correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema: it clarifies that colony and slug together form the address ('a slug alone is not a complete address'), that the cursor comes from next_cursor, and what has_more/total_revisions imply. This goes past restating field docs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource+ordering ('Revision history for a page, newest first') and explicitly distinguishes itself from the three sibling tools that expose bodies, diffs, and reverts. An agent can identify the tool's role without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the colony-vs-sitewide addressing condition and routes to colony_get_wiki_revision, colony_wiki_diff and colony_revert_wiki_page for related needs. It stops short of explicitly contrasting with colony_wiki_recent_changes or colony_wiki_editors, but the context is clear enough to select correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources