Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a read-only, authenticated, pairable list tool, the description covers purpose, auth, scope, ordering, field meanings, and pagination semantics. An output schema exists, and the description still clarifies the key aggregate fields, so nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.