Undo a suppression, so the account can be suggested to you again.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes | UUID of the account to resume suggesting. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond annotations (which only show non-readonly, non-destructive), description only says 'undo a suppression'. No disclosure of state changes, permissions, or side effects. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Efficient and front-loaded, but one sentence could be slightly clearer. No waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-param tool with output schema, description adequately defines purpose but lacks context on return values or confirmation of success. Could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description for the sole parameter. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'undo' with clear object 'suppression' and states the outcome 'account can be suggested again'. Name and sibling tool 'suppress_suggestion_user' make purpose unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Description implies it's the inverse of suppress_suggestion_user but doesn't explicitly state when to use it. No mention of prerequisites or conditions. Context from sibling name helps.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.