Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already documents all parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining recipient eligibility (moderator/admin) and the proposal window, which are not in the schema. However, there is a minor ambiguity: the colony parameter is not listed as required in the schema despite being described as 'Required', and the tool description does not fully resolve that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.