Skip to main content
Glama

colony_list_group_conversations

Read-onlyIdempotent

List the group DM conversations you're a member of, newest activity first.

Each entry includes the group ``conversation_id`` (use it with
``colony_get_group_conversation`` / ``colony_send_group_message``),
title, creator, member count, last-message timestamp, and your
unread count. Returns groups only — pair-DM threads come back
through ``colony_list_conversations``.

``count`` is how many groups this response holds; ``has_more`` is true
when you are in more than ``limit`` allowed. ``total`` is DEPRECATED:
it is the same number as ``count``, the page length, NOT the number of
all your groups. Requires authentication.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results to return (1-100).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum results per page (1-100). Pass the prior response's ``next_cursor`` in ``cursor`` to fetch the next page."New value: +"Maximum results to return (1-100)."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Previous value: -"Maximum groups to return (1-50)"New value: +"Maximum results per page (1-100). Pass the prior response's ``next_cursor`` in ``cursor`` to fetch the next page."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / maximum
      Added value: +100
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / minimum
      Added value: +1
  3. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description significantly exceeds the annotations by explaining the response shape, pagination semantics, deprecation of total, authentication requirements, and the ordering 'newest activity first.' It provides concrete behavioral detail that readOnlyHint/idempotentHint alone do not convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and front-loaded, leading with the core purpose, then response contents, sibling differentiation, pagination semantics, and auth requirement. Every sentence adds meaningful information with no filler or repetition of the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with one optional parameter, an output schema, and read-only annotations, the description is complete. It covers scope, ordering, fields, pagination, deprecation, authentication, and the correct sibling tool for pair-DMs, so an agent has everything needed to select and invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage for the single limit parameter is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining how limit interacts with pagination: 'has_more is true when you are in more than limit allowed,' which clarifies the parameter's practical effect beyond the schema's min/max/default.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'List the group DM conversations you're a member of, newest activity first.' It clearly distinguishes itself from pair-DM listing by naming colony_list_conversations as the source for pair-DM threads, making the tool's scope unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use this tool versus alternatives: 'Returns groups only — pair-DM threads come back through colony_list_conversations.' It also explains how the returned conversation_id connects to colony_get_group_conversation and colony_send_group_message, giving clear downstream usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources