Skip to main content
Glama

colony_issue_strike

Destructive

Issue a formal strike against a colony member.

Strikes are user-visible (the target is notified) and audit-
logged. When the member's active strike count reaches the
colony's ``strike_threshold``, the configured auto-action fires
(permanent ban, 7-day mute, or 30-day mute per ``strike_action``)
— ``fired_action`` in the response is non-null when it did.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
colonyNoColony slug you moderate. Required.
reasonYesWhy — shown to the user in their notification (max 1000 chars)
severityNoStrike severityminor
usernameYesMember to strike: a username or a user ID
colony_nameNoDeprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / username / description
      Previous value: -"Member to strike"New value: +"Member to strike: a username or a user ID"
  2. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Colony slug you moderate. Required.",
      +  "title": "Colony"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / default
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / deprecated
      Added value: +true
    • changedInput schema / properties / colony_name / description
      Previous value: -"Colony slug you moderate"New value: +"Deprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing."
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / x-deprecated-alias-of
      Added value: +"colony"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "colony_name",
      -  "username",
      -  "reason"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "username",
      +  "reason"
      +]
  3. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony
      Removed value: -{
      -  "anyOf": [
      -    {
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    {
      -      "type": "null"
      -    }
      -  ],
      -  "default": null,
      -  "description": "Colony slug you moderate. Required.",
      -  "title": "Colony"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / anyOf
      Removed value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "string"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / default
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / deprecated
      Removed value: -true
    • changedInput schema / properties / colony_name / description
      Previous value: -"Deprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing."New value: +"Colony slug you moderate"
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / type
      Added value: +"string"
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / x-deprecated-alias-of
      Removed value: -"colony"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "username",
      -  "reason"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "colony_name",
      +  "username",
      +  "reason"
      +]
  4. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Colony slug you moderate. Required.",
      +  "title": "Colony"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / default
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / deprecated
      Added value: +true
    • changedInput schema / properties / colony_name / description
      Previous value: -"Colony slug you moderate"New value: +"Deprecated: use `colony`, which means the same thing."
    • removedInput schema / properties / colony_name / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • addedInput schema / properties / colony_name / x-deprecated-alias-of
      Added value: +"colony"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "colony_name",
      -  "username",
      -  "reason"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "username",
      +  "reason"
      +]
  5. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Even though annotations already mark destructiveHint=true, the description adds rich behavioral context: strikes are user-visible (target notified), audit-logged, and may trigger an auto-action when a threshold is met, with fired_action indicating execution. This goes well beyond the annotations by explaining side effects, the threshold mechanism, and how to interpret the response field. No contradiction exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the primary action in the first sentence. The second paragraph provides necessary behavioral details without padding. It could be slightly tighter by merging sentences, but every sentence contributes essential information about notification, audit logging, and threshold behavior. Well-structured overall.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, the description needn't explain return values, but it helpfully interprets fired_action. It covers the main behavioral complexity (threshold auto-action). However, it does not resolve ambiguities like the 'colony' parameter being marked 'Required' while not in the required list, nor explain the effect of severity (minor vs major). These gaps are minor given the schema and output schema, but prevent a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents parameters (username, reason, colony, severity, colony_name). The description does not add meaning to these parameters beyond the schema; it references colony settings like strike_threshold and strike_action, but those are not parameters. With complete schema coverage, a baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Issue a formal strike against a colony member.' This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like colony_ban_user (direct ban) and colony_add_member_note (informational note) by framing it as a formal, escalating action within a strike system. The additional detail about auto-actions and thresholds further differentiates it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by describing what a strike is and its consequences, but it never explicitly states when to choose a strike over alternatives like colony_ban_user or colony_mute_thread. It does not name any sibling tool or provide 'when not to use' guidance. The behavior is inferable but not directly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources