Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage: reason_id explains its UUID source, colony documents the slug and default, and colony_name is marked as a deprecated alias. The description adds no parameter-level detail, so the schema carries the full burden, matching the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.