Skip to main content
Glama

OathReady: Canadian Citizenship Test

Get a practice question

get_practice_question
Read-only

Get one random Canadian citizenship test practice question from OathReady's verified bank (based on the official Discover Canada guide). Returns the question, shuffled options, the correct answer, and an explanation. Act as quizmaster: show the user ONLY the question and options, wait for their pick, then grade it and share the explanation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicNoLimit to one study topic
languageNoLanguage for the question text (default English; French draws only from translated questions)
provinceNoInclude region-specific questions for this province or territory

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesStable question id, e.g. q-042
topicYes
sourceYes
optionsYesAnswer choices in display order
languageYesBCP 47 language this item is written in ("en" | "fr")
questionYes
web_pageYesThis question's page on oathready.ca
explanationYes
correct_answerYesDo not reveal until the user has answered

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / language
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Language for the question text (default English; French draws only from translated questions)",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "en",
      +    "fr"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / language
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "BCP 47 language this item is written in (\"en\" | \"fr\")",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "id",
      -  "question",
      -  "options",
      -  "correct_answer",
      -  "explanation",
      -  "topic",
      -  "source",
      -  "web_page"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "language",
      +  "id",
      +  "question",
      +  "options",
      +  "correct_answer",
      +  "explanation",
      +  "topic",
      +  "source",
      +  "web_page"
      +]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description fully discloses the interactive behavior beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. It explains the expected flow (show, wait, grade, explain) and confirms the read-only nature. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: purpose, return content, and usage instruction. No fluff, front-loaded with the core action. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose, return structure, and interactive usage. With an output schema present, the description is sufficient for an agent to understand the tool and use it correctly. All optional parameters are explained in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers all three parameters with descriptions (topic, language, province). The tool description adds context about the source (OathReady's verified bank) and the quizmaster flow, but does not enhance parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides. With 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves one random practice question from a verified bank, and specifies the quizmaster interaction pattern. It is distinct from siblings like get_mock_test or get_daily_challenge by focusing on a single question with an interactive flow.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit instructions on how to use the tool: show only question and options, wait for user pick, then grade and explain. This is a clear usage guideline. It does not explicitly compare to alternatives, but the context of sibling tools and the 'random' nature imply it is for isolated practice, not full tests.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources