Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only a marginal hint that the payload is the form's questions rather than answers or metadata, which is a small contribution for a tool with no output schema to explain the response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is certainly short and has no wasted words, but it is an incomplete sentence rather than a front-loaded explanation. Conciseness here shades into under-specification rather than economy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with full schema coverage and annotations, an agent still cannot tell whether the response contains question text, options, ordering, or the student's answers (which have a separate sibling). With no output schema, the description needed to state what comes back, and it does not.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single integer formId whose schema text already points to list_anamnesis_forms as the id source. The description adds no further semantics, so the baseline 3 for fully documented parameters applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"The questions of one anamnesis form" is a noun fragment with no verb; only the title ("See an anamnesis form") supplies the retrieval intent. It does hint at scope (questions of a single form) but doesn't clearly separate it from siblings like list_anamnesis_forms or list_anamnesis_answers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool, no prerequisites, and no mention of when to use list_anamnesis_forms or list_anamnesis_answers instead. The only routing hint sits in the parameter schema ("Id from list_anamnesis_forms"), not in the description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.