Music360 MCP

music360_list_show

Lista registros de show do tenant atual.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`page`	No
`search`	No
`order_by`	No	Campo para ordenacao (ex.: data_lancamento/lancamento, nome, atualizacao, criacao). Para produto fonografico, "lancamento" e "mais recente" significam data_lancamento. Quando omitido, usa ordenacao padrao da entidade.
`per_page`	No
`order_dir`	No	Direcao da ordenacao: ASC crescente, DESC decrescente (padrao).
`response_profile`	No	Perfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.
`sensitive_access_purpose`	No	Finalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.
`include_sensitive_details`	No	Retorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`data`	Yes	Resultado paginado.
`success`	Yes	Indica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.
`entity_type`	Yes	Tipo da entidade consultada.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed4 schema fields changedJun 7, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / include_sensitive_details

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Retorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / response_profile

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Perfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.",
+  "enum": [
+    "summary",
+    "standard",
+    "sensitive"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / sensitive_access_purpose

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Finalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "Resultado paginado.",
+      "properties": {
+        "data": {
+          "description": "Lista de registros encontrados.",
+          "items": {
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        "page": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        },
+        "per_page": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        },
+        "total": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        },
+        "total_pages": {
+          "type": "integer"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "data",
+        "total",
+        "page",
+        "per_page",
+        "total_pages"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "entity_type": {
+      "description": "Tipo da entidade consultada.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "success": {
+      "description": "Indica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "success",
+    "entity_type",
+    "data"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Changed1 schema field changedJun 3, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / order_by / description

Previous value: -"Campo para ordenacao (ex.: data_lancamento, nome, atualizacao, criacao). Quando omitido, usa ordenacao padrao da entidade."New value: +"Campo para ordenacao (ex.: data_lancamento/lancamento, nome, atualizacao, criacao). Para produto fonografico, \"lancamento\" e \"mais recente\" significam data_lancamento. Quando omitido, usa ordenacao padrao da entidade."

First observedJun 3, 2026

TDQS

C2.6/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only mentions tenant scoping but omits critical behaviors like pagination, default ordering, response profiles, sensitive data handling, and authentication requirements. The schema implies these behaviors but the description does not explain them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no fluff, but it is under-specified. While front-loaded and brief, it sacrifices necessary detail, making it not 'appropriately sized' for a tool with this complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 8 parameters, no annotations, and a complex schema (response profiles, sensitive handling), a one-sentence description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain return behavior, defaults, sensitive access requirements, or relationship to other list tools. The output schema exists but is not described in the text.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter information beyond the schema. Schema description coverage is 63%, meaning several parameters (page, search, per_page) lack schema descriptions, and the description does not compensate for this gap. The self-explanatory names partially mitigate the issue, but the description itself provides zero value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Lista registros de show') and scope ('do tenant atual'), identifying it as a list operation for shows within the current tenant. However, it does not explicitly distinguish it from the related get_show tool, though the verb 'list' conveys multiplicity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as get_show for a single show, or how to combine it with other list tools. There is no mention of pagination, filtering, or other usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Music360 MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?