Skip to main content
Glama

music360_list_contrato_partes

Lista as partes (contratado/contratante/interveniente) vinculadas a um contrato usando somente public_uid.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contrato_idYespublic_uid do contrato.
response_profileNoPerfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.
sensitive_access_purposeNoFinalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.
include_sensitive_detailsNoRetorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesLista de registros vinculados.
successYesIndica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.
entity_idYespublic_uid da entidade pai.
sub_entityYesTipo da sub-entidade listada.
entity_typeYesTipo da entidade pai.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / include_sensitive_details
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Retorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_profile
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Perfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "summary",
      +    "standard",
      +    "sensitive"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / sensitive_access_purpose
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Finalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Lista de registros vinculados.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "entity_id": {
      +      "description": "public_uid da entidade pai.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "entity_type": {
      +      "description": "Tipo da entidade pai.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "sub_entity": {
      +      "description": "Tipo da sub-entidade listada.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "description": "Indica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "entity_type",
      +    "entity_id",
      +    "sub_entity",
      +    "data"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, permissions, or handling of sensitive data. The phrase 'usando somente public_uid' is about input, not behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that is concise and to the point, with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple listing nature and presence of a complete output schema, the description sufficiently covers the main purpose. It could mention sensitive profiles, but those are already documented in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description's reference to 'public_uid' merely echoes the schema's description for contrato_id without adding extra semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists the parties (contracted/contracting/intervening) linked to a contract using public_uid. It is specific about the resource and verb, and distinguishes from sibling tools like list_contrato and get_contrato.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when needing contract parties but does not explicitly provide alternatives or when-not-to-use cases. It mentions 'somente public_uid' but lacks direct comparison with sibling list/get tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources