Skip to main content
Glama

music360_get_show

Consulta um registro de show do tenant atual usando somente public_uid.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYespublic_uid do registro. Não use ID numérico interno.
response_profileNoPerfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.
sensitive_access_purposeNoFinalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.
include_sensitive_detailsNoRetorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesDados completos do registro.
successYesIndica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.
entity_idYespublic_uid do registro encontrado.
entity_typeYesTipo da entidade consultada.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / include_sensitive_details
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Retorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_profile
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Perfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "summary",
      +    "standard",
      +    "sensitive"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / sensitive_access_purpose
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Finalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "description": "Dados completos do registro.",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "entity_id": {
      +      "description": "public_uid do registro encontrado.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "entity_type": {
      +      "description": "Tipo da entidade consultada.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "description": "Indica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success",
      +    "entity_type",
      +    "entity_id",
      +    "data"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden. It discloses two important behavioral constraints: tenant scoping (do tenant atual) and the exclusive use of public_uid (not internal numeric IDs). These go beyond a generic 'get show' and help the agent avoid common mistakes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the main action, and zero filler. Every word adds value—verb, resource, scope, and access method are all packed efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the presence of an output schema, and full parameter descriptions, the description is almost complete. It lacks explicit guidance on when to use response_profile or sensitive details, but those are documented in the schema, so the gap is minor.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% parameter descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The description reinforces that 'id' must be a public_uid, but this adds no new meaning beyond the schema's existing description for that parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb (Consulta) and resource (registro de show), and scopes it to the current tenant. It clearly distinguishes from sibling list tools and other get_* tools by specifying the unique access method (somente public_uid).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides clear context for usage: retrieving a single show record using the public_uid. It implicitly excludes list operations and other get tools, but does not explicitly name alternatives or state when-not-to-use conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources