Music360 MCP

music360_get_produto_fonografico

Consulta um registro de produto fonográfico do tenant atual usando somente public_uid.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`id`	Yes	public_uid do registro. Não use ID numérico interno.
`response_profile`	No	Perfil de resposta. Listagens usam summary por padrão; sensitive exige admin.
`sensitive_access_purpose`	No	Finalidade operacional obrigatória quando response_profile=sensitive ou include_sensitive_details=true.
`include_sensitive_details`	No	Retorna detalhes sensíveis mínimos quando autorizado por escopo admin. Padrão: false.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`data`	Yes	Dados completos do registro.
`success`	Yes	Indica se a operacao foi bem-sucedida.
`entity_id`	Yes	public_uid do registro encontrado.
`entity_type`	Yes	Tipo da entidade consultada.

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. 'Consulta' indicates a read-only operation, which is helpful, but the description does not disclose authorization requirements for sensitive profiles, error behavior, or any other side effects beyond the basic read intent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that starts with the verb and resource, including the key distinguishing detail (public_uid) without any unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-record lookup, the description combined with the complete input schema and presence of an output schema is sufficient. It does not explicitly cover sensitive-access workflows, but those are fully described in the parameter properties.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents all parameters with 100% coverage. The description adds a slight constraint with 'usando somente public_uid' and tenant scoping, but these are largely echoed in the schema descriptions. There is no substantial added meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is specific: it names the verb 'Consulta', the resource 'registro de produto fonográfico', the tenant scoping, and the retrieval method 'usando somente public_uid'. This clearly distinguishes it from the list sibling (music360_list_produto_fonografico) and from other entity-specific get_* tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies single-record retrieval by public_uid, which contrasts with list alternatives. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use the tool or name alternative tools, so it stops short of full guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Music360 MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting a specific entity or reference data. The get/list distinction is standard and unambiguous. Reference list tools are also clearly separated by domain.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with the prefix 'music360_'. Verbs are consistently 'get', 'list', 'search', or 'healthcheck', and the naming is uniform throughout. No mixed conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count2/5

At 33 tools, the set is quite large, exceeding the threshold where tool count becomes unwieldy. While the domain has many entity types, the lack of mutation tools means many similar read-only list/get tools inflate the count without adding corresponding functionality.

Completeness1/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for a management system: there are no create, update, or delete tools for any entity. The reference list tools explicitly reference create tools like 'music360_create_fonograma' that do not exist, leaving clear dead ends and an inability to perform core operations.

Resources

Need Help?