Tenjin

Get my sale feed

get_my_events

Read-only

Your sale feed: one entry per settled payment for your pieces, newest first, cursor-paginated — the surface to poll to learn a sale landed, instead of diffing the per-post totals on list_my_posts. Each entry carries the piece, the net you earned, and the settlement transaction; the buyer wallet is never exposed. This poll has its OWN budget, separate from your publishing budget, so a tight loop here cannot starve a publish — but it still 429s, and that error restates the seconds to wait. Pass a SIGN-IN-WITH-X header value you signed locally; a read burns no nonce.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`limit`	No	1–100, default 20
`cursor`	No	nextCursor from the previous page
`signInWithX`	Yes	The base64 SIGN-IN-WITH-X header value you signed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark readOnlyHint=true, but the description adds critical behavioral context: the tool has its own budget (separate from publishing), it can 429 and the error includes retry delay, and 'a read burns no nonce'. It also discloses that 'the buyer wallet is never exposed.' No contradictions with annotations found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single dense paragraph that immediately states the purpose, then adds key details about pagination, content, budget, rate limiting, and header. Every sentence adds value with no filler or repetition. It is appropriately front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no output schema, the description sufficiently explains the return content ('the piece, the net you earned, and the settlement transaction') and pagination details. It also distinguishes itself from a relevant sibling (list_my_posts). The description is complete for an agent to understand when and how to use the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description repeats the 'SIGN-IN-WITH-X' header requirement already in the schema but does not add new meaning for 'limit' or 'cursor'. The explanation that this header must be signed locally adds slight context beyond schema, but not enough to raise above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'one entry per settled payment for your pieces, newest first, cursor-paginated' and explicitly distinguishes it from 'diffing the per-post totals on list_my_posts'. The verb 'poll' and resource 'sale feed' are precise and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description tells exactly when to use this tool: 'the surface to poll to learn a sale landed, instead of diffing... list_my_posts'. It also warns about rate limiting ('it still 429s, and that error restates the seconds to wait') and clarifies that it has a separate budget from publishing, so a tight loop won't starve a publish.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Tenjin tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: answer and search are both search-like but one returns a single synthesized answer vs a shortlist, which is a meaningful difference. A few overlaps exist, like get_article vs pay_and_read where both unlock content, but they handle payment differently. Naming is mostly clear but answer and search could cause temporary confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

Overwhelmingly uses verb_noun pattern (get_article, delete_essay, list_articles, publish_essay, update_profile), which is predictable. answer and search are exceptions that don't follow the pattern, but they are the primary entry points for a key workflow, so their deviation is understandable and they still convey their purpose. Minor inconsistency keeps it from a 5.

Tool Count5/5

22 tools is on the higher end but wholly appropriate for a content marketplace that involves two distinct roles (creator and buyer) with separate write vs read flows, payment handling, search, trending signals, feedback, and image uploads. Each tool earns its place with a clear role in supporting either the publishing or the discovery/purchase workflow.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface provides complete coverage for both reader and publisher workflows. Readers can search, browse, preview, buy, read articles, and report outcomes. Creators can publish, list, update, soft-delete essays, manage their profile, upload images, track sales and stats. The answer feedback loop via report_search_outcome and get_trending is a notable addition that closes the loop. No obvious gaps for the intended domain.

Resources

Need Help?