Misar.Blog MCP Server

Get my profile

get_profile

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch the authenticated account's own creator profile: id, username, display name, bio, public profile URL, and whether Stripe payouts are connected.

Use it to confirm which account a key belongs to before acting on that account's behalf, to get your own profile id for tools that take a UUID, or to check stripe_connected before discussing paid posts. It only ever describes the caller — there is no tool here for looking up someone else's profile.

Reads only; nothing is modified. Requires an API key, and takes no parameters. Errors if the key is missing or invalid, which is the quickest way to test authentication.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false. The description adds context about requiring an API key, error behavior if key is invalid, and that it never describes other users. This goes beyond annotations, though the safety profile is already clear. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each dense with useful info: action, specific fields, use cases, exclusions, auth requirement. No fluff; every sentence earns its place. Front-loaded with the primary purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description covers all essential aspects: what it returns (profile fields), when to use it, limitations (only caller), authentication, and error conditions. For a simple tool, this is fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters)Skip to content. The description explicitly states 'takes no parameters', which is clear and sufficient. With 0 params, baseline is 4 and the mention supports it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches the authenticated account's own creator profile, listing specific fields (id, username, display name, bio, URL, stripe_connected). It distinguishes itself from siblings by explicitly noting there is no tool for looking up others' profiles, making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit use cases: confirming key ownership, retrieving profile ID for other tools, checking stripe_connected before discussing paid posts. Also states exclusions: 'no tool here for looking up someone else's profile', which guides tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Misar.Blog MCP Server tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

The tools mostly map to clearly distinct resources and actions, with good behavioral separation between create_draft, publish_article, and update_article, and between the two title-generating tools. Some naming choices are still slightly misleading, such as get_series returning the full collection rather than a single series, and generate_cover_image references a non-existent upload_image tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a clean lowercase verb_noun pattern, including create_*, get_*, list_*, and add_* names. Notable exceptions are upgrade, a bare verb that also mixes read and mutate behaviors, and get_series, which functions more like a list than a get.

Tool Count3/5

23 tools is in the heavy range for an MCP server, exceeding the ideal 3-15 span. That said, the tools do span legitimate blogging concerns such as articles, reactions, series, newsletters, analytics, and AI assistance, so the count feels broad rather than padded.

Completeness2/5

The surface covers article creation, reading, updating, and publishing, but there is no delete or unpublish for articles/drafts, no way to remove an article from a series, and no update/delete for series. The dangling reference to upload_image in generate_cover_image also suggests a missing tool, and agents will hit dead ends trying to undo publication or remove content.

Resources

Need Help?