Skip to main content
Glama

Atlarium Habitat Database MCP

Search products

search_products
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search public habitat products in the Atlarium database.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
brandNoProduct brand filter.
limitNoMaximum number of public records to return, up to 50.
queryNoSearch text used to match public Atlarium records.
offsetNoZero-based pagination offset for public search results.
categoryNoProduct category filter.
languageNoOptional preferred response language: it, en or es.
use_caseNoUse-case filter such as filtration, lighting or fertilization.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
toolYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / generated_at
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "data",
      -  "generated_at",
      -  "tool"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "data",
      +  "tool"
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / brand / description
      Added value: +"Product brand filter."
    • addedInput schema / properties / category / description
      Added value: +"Product category filter."
    • addedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Added value: +"Optional preferred response language: it, en or es."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Maximum number of public records to return, up to 50."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Added value: +"Zero-based pagination offset for public search results."
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / description
      Added value: +"Search text used to match public Atlarium records."
    • addedInput schema / properties / use_case / description
      Added value: +"Use-case filter such as filtration, lighting or fertilization."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {},
      +    "generated_at": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "data",
      +    "generated_at",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the description adds only the scope of 'public habitat products' and 'Atlarium database.' This is useful but minimal beyond the annotations; no extra behavioral traits such as pagination behavior or access constraints are disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence ('Search public habitat products in the Atlarium database.') that is front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word serves a purpose, and there is no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 7 optional parameters, a full output schema, and annotations, the description is acceptable but minimal. It does not mention filtering capabilities, pagination, or language options, though these are present in the schema. The lack of usage guidance and alternative tool references leaves some context gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all seven parameters, so the schema carries the burden of parameter meaning. The description adds no additional parameter semantics, only mentioning 'public habitat products' which could imply filters but does not explicitly link to any schema properties.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches for products ('Search public habitat products in the Atlarium database'), using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling search tools by focusing on 'products' rather than algae, diseases, or equipment, but it does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like get_product_profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_product_profile, list_product_brands, or other search_* tools). There is no mention of preferred scenarios or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name and schema alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.