Skip to main content
Glama

Atlarium Habitat Database MCP

Search medicines

search_medicines
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search public aquarium medicine and treatment product profiles.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeNoDiagnostic profile type filter.
limitNoMaximum number of public records to return, up to 50.
queryNoSearch text used to match public Atlarium records.
offsetNoZero-based pagination offset for public search results.
languageNoOptional preferred response language: it, en or es.
difficultyNoDiagnostic difficulty filter from 1 to 5.
water_typeNoWater or habitat type filter.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
toolYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / generated_at
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "data",
      -  "generated_at",
      -  "tool"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "data",
      +  "tool"
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / difficulty / description
      Added value: +"Diagnostic difficulty filter from 1 to 5."
    • addedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Added value: +"Optional preferred response language: it, en or es."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Maximum number of public records to return, up to 50."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Added value: +"Zero-based pagination offset for public search results."
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / description
      Added value: +"Search text used to match public Atlarium records."
    • addedInput schema / properties / type / description
      Added value: +"Diagnostic profile type filter."
    • addedInput schema / properties / water_type / description
      Added value: +"Water or habitat type filter."
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds the 'public' qualifier, indicating the search only covers public profiles, but does not disclose pagination or language behavior (though these are in the schema).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with no filler. It immediately states the action and target, earning a high score for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the full schema, output schema, and strong annotations, the description provides adequate context for a simple search tool. However, it lacks any guidance on how this search relates to sibling search tools, which is a minor gap in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% parameter description coverage, so each of the 7 parameters is already documented. The description adds no additional parameter context, but the baseline of 3 applies because the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('Search') and resource ('public aquarium medicine and treatment product profiles'). This distinguishes it from sibling search tools like search_products or search_diseases, which target different record types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling search tools. It does not mention alternatives or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer from the resource name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.