Skip to main content
Glama

Atlarium Habitat Database MCP

Search guides

search_guides
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search Atlarium habitat guides and educational content.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of public records to return, up to 50.
queryNoSearch text used to match public Atlarium records.
topicNoGuide topic filter.
offsetNoZero-based pagination offset for public search results.
languageNoOptional preferred response language: it, en or es.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
toolYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / generated_at
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • changedOutput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "data",
      -  "generated_at",
      -  "tool"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "data",
      +  "tool"
      +]
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Added value: +"Optional preferred response language: it, en or es."
    • addedInput schema / properties / limit / description
      Added value: +"Maximum number of public records to return, up to 50."
    • addedInput schema / properties / offset / description
      Added value: +"Zero-based pagination offset for public search results."
    • addedInput schema / properties / query / description
      Added value: +"Search text used to match public Atlarium records."
    • addedInput schema / properties / topic / description
      Added value: +"Guide topic filter."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": false,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {},
      +    "generated_at": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tool": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "data",
      +    "generated_at",
      +    "tool"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the agent knows this is a safe read operation. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the act of searching, but it does not contradict the annotations. Given the comprehensive annotation coverage, a neutral score is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It communicates the core purpose efficiently and wastes no space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema fully documents all parameters, an output schema exists, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description identifies the resource type clearly. The only gap is usage differentiation, which is already scored separately, so overall the context is sufficient for a simple search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All five parameters have full descriptions in the schema, including constraints like maxLength, maximum, and enum values. The description adds no additional meaning or context beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is warranted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the verb 'Search' with a specific resource ('Atlarium habitat guides and educational content'), which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools that search species, products, or other data. However, 'educational content' is somewhat broad and could overlap with guides, so it is not perfectly scoped.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other search tools or get_guide. There are no exclusions, alternatives, or contextual hints about whether this is for broad discovery or specific guide lookup.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.