Atlarium Habitat Database MCP

Search diseases

search_diseases

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search public aquatic disease diagnostic profiles and advisory treatment information.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`type`	No	Diagnostic profile type filter.
`limit`	No	Maximum number of public records to return, up to 50.
`query`	No	Search text used to match public Atlarium records.
`offset`	No	Zero-based pagination offset for public search results.
`language`	No	Optional preferred response language: it, en or es.
`difficulty`	No	Diagnostic difficulty filter from 1 to 5.
`water_type`	No	Water or habitat type filter.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes
`tool`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

Changed2 schema fields changedJul 2, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / generated_at
```
Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}
```

changedOutput schema / required

Previous value: -[
-  "data",
-  "generated_at",
-  "tool"
-]New value: +[
+  "data",
+  "tool"
+]

Changed7 schema fields changedJun 20, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / difficulty / description

Added value: +"Diagnostic difficulty filter from 1 to 5."

addedInput schema / properties / language / description

Added value: +"Optional preferred response language: it, en or es."

addedInput schema / properties / limit / description

Added value: +"Maximum number of public records to return, up to 50."

addedInput schema / properties / offset / description

Added value: +"Zero-based pagination offset for public search results."

addedInput schema / properties / query / description

Added value: +"Search text used to match public Atlarium records."

addedInput schema / properties / type / description
```
Added value: +"Diagnostic profile type filter."
```
addedInput schema / properties / water_type / description
```
Added value: +"Water or habitat type filter."
```

AddedJun 20, 2026

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds value by noting the 'public' scope and 'advisory' nature of the information, which are useful contextual additions. However, it does not elaborate on authentication needs, rate limits, or other behavioral aspects beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence: 'Search public aquatic disease diagnostic profiles and advisory treatment information.' It contains no redundant words and every phrase contributes to understanding the tool's purpose, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a complete input schema, an output schema, and strong annotations, the description covers the essential purpose and adds the 'public' and 'advisory' context. It is brief but sufficient for a search tool; the only notable gap is the lack of comparison with alternative search tools, which is more a usage-guideline issue than a completeness one.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for all 7 parameters, so each parameter is already documented in the input schema. The description does not add any parameter-specific semantics beyond the general mention of disease profiles and advisory treatment information, which is consistent with the baseline for full schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Search' and clearly identifies the resource as 'public aquatic disease diagnostic profiles and advisory treatment information.' This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_disease_profile (single profile retrieval) and match_diagnostic_profiles (matching profiles), making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention exclusions or suggest related tools such as get_disease_profile or match_diagnostic_profiles, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context without explicit direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Atlarium Habitat Database MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.