get_guideGet a structured public Atlarium guide using the exact slug returned by search_guides.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | Exact safe slug path returned by the related Atlarium search tool. | |
| language | No | Optional preferred response language: it, en or es. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes | ||
| tool | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Input schema / properties / slug / descriptionPrevious value: -"Safe public Atlarium slug path made of one or more path segments."New value: +"Exact safe slug path returned by the related Atlarium search tool."Output schema / properties / generated_atRemoved value: -{
- "type": "string"
-}Output schema / requiredPrevious value: -[
- "data",
- "generated_at",
- "tool"
-]New value: +[
+ "data",
+ "tool"
+]Input schema / properties / language / descriptionAdded value: +"Optional preferred response language: it, en or es."Input schema / properties / slug / descriptionAdded value: +"Safe public Atlarium slug path made of one or more path segments."Output schema / (root)Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+ "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+ "additionalProperties": false,
+ "properties": {
+ "data": {},
+ "generated_at": {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ "tool": {
+ "type": "string"
+ }
+ },
+ "required": [
+ "data",
+ "generated_at",
+ "tool"
+ ],
+ "type": "object"
+}Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds that the guide is 'structured public', which is useful context about data access and format. That additional context justifies a 3, but the heavy lifting is done by annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that immediately states the core action, resource, and key dependency. Every word is necessary; there is no redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get tool with two well-documented parameters, an output schema, and strong annotation coverage, the description is complete. It covers what the tool does, how to invoke it (using the slug), and the public nature of the data. Minor gaps like error behavior are acceptable given the simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema already fully documents both parameters. The description verbally reinforces the slug's origin and the language's optional nature, but adds no new semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('structured public Atlarium guide'), and explicitly ties the slug to the output of the sibling tool 'search_guides'. This clearly differentiates it from other get_* and search_* tools in the sibling list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives a clear condition for use: you must have the exact slug returned by search_guides. This implies the prerequisite step. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or mention alternative tools for similar tasks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.