Skip to main content
Glama

Read plan, limits, and current usage

get_account
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return the team's plan, its limits, and current usage. Use this BEFORE deploy_site or add_custom_domain to know whether a deploy would trip a plan limit, instead of provoking PLAN_LIMIT_EXCEEDED. Also returns the per-token MCP rate-limit ceiling (live remaining is in X-RateLimit-Remaining response header).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
planYesEffective plan name: Free, Solo, Freemium, Maker, Studio, Business, Ultimate.
teamYes
usageYes
limitsYes
planExpiresAtYesISO timestamp when the plan downgrades to Free, or null if no expiry set.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / request_id
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Server-assigned request correlation id. Quote it when contacting support.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / plan / description
      Previous value: -"Effective plan name: Free, Freemium, Maker, Studio, Business, Ultimate."New value: +"Effective plan name: Free, Solo, Freemium, Maker, Studio, Business, Ultimate."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / request_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Server-assigned request correlation id. Quote it when contacting support.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint and idempotentHint annotations, the description discloses additional behavioral details: it returns the per-token MCP rate-limit ceiling and points to the X-RateLimit-Remaining response header for live remaining quota. This adds meaningful context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler. The core purpose is front-loaded, followed by a specific usage directive and a useful note about rate limits. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, parameterless read-only tool with an output schema and safety annotations, the description is complete. It explains what is returned, when to use it, and even orients the agent to the rate-limit header.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to document. The description appropriately focuses on return value semantics instead, meeting the baseline for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: it returns the team's plan, limits, and current usage, plus the rate-limit ceiling. This unambiguously distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_site or list_deploys.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to call this BEFORE deploy_site or add_custom_domain to check plan limits and avoid PLAN_LIMIT_EXCEEDED. This gives the agent a concrete decision rule for when to invoke it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.