Property · Land area (sqm)
properties_basics_land_area_sqmParcel land area in square metres from the cadastral feed.
Price: 3¢ per call.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnaf_id | Yes |
properties_basics_land_area_sqmParcel land area in square metres from the cadastral feed.
Price: 3¢ per call.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnaf_id | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Output schema / (root)Previous value: -{
- "properties": {
- "available": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "boolean"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "description": "`false` on no-data responses. Omitted on success — branch on `data !== null` if you want a single discriminator.",
- "title": "Available"
- },
- "data": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "example": {
- "land_area_sqm": 814
- },
- "properties": {
- "land_area_sqm": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "number"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "description": "Land size in square metres — the figure the property was advertised with, not a survey or cadastral parcel measurement, so treat it as indicative. Acreage advertised in hectares is converted to square metres for you (1 ha = 10,000 sqm), which means small values are rare by construction and a suspiciously round large number may be a converted one. Null means no listing stated a land size; expect that on most apartments and units.",
- "title": "Land Area Sqm"
- }
- },
- "required": [
- "land_area_sqm"
- ],
- "title": "LandAreaSqm",
- "type": "object"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "description": "The endpoint's payload, or `null` when Microburbs has no value."
- },
- "message": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "description": "Human-readable explanation. Omitted on success.",
- "title": "Message"
- },
- "reason": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "description": "Machine-readable slug naming the no-data condition (e.g. `no_avm_for_GANSW704074813`). Stable per endpoint. Omitted on success.",
- "title": "Reason"
- }
- },
- "title": "ApiResponse[LandAreaSqm]",
- "type": "object",
- "x-fastmcp-top-level-schema": "ApiResponse_LandAreaSqm_"
-}New value: +nullDoes the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already communicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior, so the description only needs to add context beyond that. It adds the cadastral-feed source and the per-call price, but does not disclose response shape or failure modes. This is adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, each with a distinct purpose: state what the tool returns and where the data comes from, then disclose the cost. There is no filler or redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-parameter, read-only, well-annotated tool, this is nearly complete: the schema supplies the required input, the description states the output unit and source, and annotations cover safety. The main missing piece is explicit parameter semantics, but the overall complexity is low.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The sole parameter gnaf_id has no schema description (0% coverage), and the description does not explain what a GNAF ID is, what format it takes, or how to obtain one. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond the schema's name and type.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the resource ('parcel land area'), the unit ('square metres'), and the data source ('cadastral feed'), which distinguishes it from sibling basic-property tools like bed count or dwelling type. It lacks an explicit verb, but the noun-phrase form is unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool instead of properties_basics_all or properties_valuation_land_values, and no mention of how to obtain a gnaf_id or what prerequisites exist. The agent must infer usage context entirely from the name and schema.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.