Skip to main content
Glama
This connector has been deprecated

Need to make it a revenue generating mcp connection and a earning source and not provide for free.

quantize_tensors

Executes hardware-aware, piecewise asymmetric INT8 linear tensor quantization to compress high-density float32 weights arrays down to uniform integer sectors. Dynamically calculates block-wise scaling constants and zero-point alignment metrics to isolate distribution outliers. Clamps values strictly between the standard 0 and 255 byte limits to accelerate tensor processing array processing speeds.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
block_sizeNoThe discrete integer segment capacity (default: 128) over which independent scaling bounds and shifts are calculated to preserve weight density precision.
tensor_dataYesA flattened array of float32 values representing the raw weight distributions or dense mathematical matrices to undergo byte quantization.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the quantization process (block-wise scaling, clamping) but fails to mention behavioral traits like whether it modifies input, returns a new tensor, error conditions, or performance trade-offs. Annotations are absent, so the description should provide more transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences cover the tool's function, but could be more front-loaded. Some redundancy ('processing speeds') exists, but overall it is reasonably concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The explanation of the algorithm is detailed, but critical elements are missing: no output description, no prerequisites, no error handling. With no output schema, the description should clarify what is returned.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with adequate parameter descriptions. The main description adds general context but does not significantly enhance understanding beyond the schema, justifying baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool performs tensor quantization ('Executes hardware-aware, piecewise asymmetric INT8 linear tensor quantization'), specifying the input type (float32) and output bounds (0-255). It is distinct from siblings which are unrelated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or when it is appropriate to use, leaving the agent to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a completely different domain: kinematics, AST fuzzing, and tensor quantization. There is no overlap in purpose, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (compute_kinematics, fuzz_boundaries, quantize_tensors), providing predictability.

Tool Count4/5

With only three tools, the server feels slightly undersized for a 'computational factory' scope, but each tool is a well-defined utility; the count is reasonable for a niche server.

Completeness3/5

The domain is unclear, but the tools cover three disjoint areas. For a broad 'factory' there are obvious gaps (e.g., no optimization, simulation, or data handling), but for a focused set of utilities, coverage is adequate.

Resources