Skip to main content
Glama

List chart annotations

list_annotations
Read-onlyIdempotent

The notes on the site's time charts in a range (default 30 days), with their ids. Use the id with update_annotation or delete_annotation.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_annotations"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toNoLast day, inclusive (YYYY-MM-DD).
fromNoFirst day (YYYY-MM-DD, site time zone). Use with to instead of period.
siteNoSite domain (example.com), id or public id (tb_…). Optional with a site key, or when the account has one site.
periodNoTime range. Default 30d. today, yesterday, 24h, 7d, 30d, 90d, 12m, wtd, mtd, ytd, all.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and not open-world. The description adds the default 30-day range and the ID workflow, but it does not add much beyond the schema and annotations, such as pagination, ordering, or permission requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences with no wasted language, and it front-loads the resource and returned data before mentioning the ID workflow.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with four optional, fully documented parameters and annotations covering safety behavior, the description is mostly complete. It says what is returned (notes and IDs) and gives the default range, though it could mention the list nature or return ordering more explicitly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already well documented in the input schema. The description only reiterates the default 30-day range and does not add syntax or behavior beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the specific resource and scope: notes on the site's time charts within a date range, returned with IDs. It is not a verb-first statement, but it clearly distinguishes the tool from update_annotation and delete_annotation by explaining that their IDs come from this listing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It indicates downstream usage by saying the returned ID should be used with update_annotation or delete_annotation, but it does not explicitly state when to call list_annotations versus other list or chart tools. Usage is implied rather than fully guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources