x402_merchant
[x402] List all x402 Bazaar resources under a merchant payTo wallet. Costs $0.001.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| payTo | Yes |
[x402] List all x402 Bazaar resources under a merchant payTo wallet. Costs $0.001.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| payTo | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description mentions a cost of $0.001 but does not disclose other behavioral traits such as read-only nature, side effects, or pagination. Without annotations, more transparency is expected.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise, with a single sentence and cost note, front-loading the purpose. However, it could include a brief note on parameters without losing efficiency.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, error conditions, or how to handle the limit parameter, which is critical for a paid tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description only hints at payTo being a wallet identifier without explaining format or usage. The limit parameter is not described at all.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists x402 Bazaar resources under a merchant payTo wallet, specifying the verb, resource, and scope. It is distinct from sibling tools like x402_discover or x402_inspect.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like x402_discover or x402_inspect. The description lacks use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.